Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: indianrightwinger
The only reason Thomas's ratings were so low is because of all the phony charges of sexual harrassment, featuring pubic hair on Coke cans.

The objections to Miers are all very legitimate and concern is increasing.

This is the worst nomination to the Supreme Court of all-time and the damage to Bush and the GOP is going to get far worse if it isn't withdrawn.

6 posted on 10/12/2005 10:43:41 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky

The lowest 26% number is right after he was nominated. Not after the stupid issues were drummed up.


8 posted on 10/12/2005 10:46:03 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
"The only reason Thomas's ratings were so low is because of all the phony charges of sexual harassment, featuring pubic hair on Coke cans."

That came out late in the process after the committee already asked their questions and grilled the guy.

Anita Hill was a whitness that came at the end and it all started all over again!

10 posted on 10/12/2005 10:48:33 PM PDT by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
The only reason Thomas's ratings were so low is because of all the phony charges of sexual harrassment, featuring pubic hair on Coke cans.

Please stop rewriting history to make it accord with how you wanted it to be. Thomas was cast as an intellectual weakling and an AA appointment and that criticism came from left and right.

Oppose Miers on the merits.

12 posted on 10/12/2005 10:50:24 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
This is the worst nomination to the Supreme Court of all-time

Not worst. Two Words -- ABE FORTAS

17 posted on 10/12/2005 10:55:30 PM PDT by msnimje (What in Bork's name was Bush thinking?............................Captain Ed..9 Oct 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

Oh come on. Your hyperventilating...

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is far worse. And that's a sitting Supreme... There's other "winners" on the court too.

Miers couldn't be worse if she tried.


22 posted on 10/12/2005 11:05:43 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky; All
This is the worst nomination to the Supreme Court of all-time

Worse than nomination of Ginsburg, Breyer, Stevens, Souter, O'Connors?!

You must know something many of us do not know about her that make you make such a statement. Please share it with us and enlighten us because we are living in darkness here.

Come on Ol'Sparky enlighten us, we are all hearing.

36 posted on 10/13/2005 5:47:54 AM PDT by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson