The thing that really gets me is that feminism was supposedly created to counter the dominance of one sex over another.
Yet that's precisely what I see in these marriages: domination. Only now the shoe is on the other foot.
How ironic. And hypocritical.
When called on this, these women will explode with anger. They'll obtusely attack the messenger, and proclaim their dogma to be unquestionable, even in the face of clear contrary evidence. The answer to men running from them is to blame the men, because someone has to take the blame for their situation, and it sure as hell isn't going to be themselves.
But the world itself is not changed by their tantrum. They can't change the fact that for every action there is a reaction. They can't change the behavior of the "marriage market", for lack of a better term. They can't scream or belittle the backlash of boycott against marriage (pun intended), and they can't get a judge to make someone offer them a ring (yet).
So they get mad (hey, that's what worked up 'til now!) and write angry snarky articles, one of which being the article at the top of this thread.
The answer to the female cacophony, and all the destruction that goes with it, is for men to stop listening, put Sheila back in the box, take control back and clean up the mess.
DA740