Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dog Owner Indicted For Animal's Attack On Boy
kxas-tv ^ | 10-13-2005

Posted on 10/13/2005 2:03:03 PM PDT by tuffydoodle

Dog Owner Indicted For Animal's Attack On Boy

POSTED: 9:53 am CDT October 13, 2005 UPDATED: 10:05 am CDT October 13, 2005

WACO, Texas -- A man accused of sitting on his front porch drinking beer while his pit bull-terrier mix attacked a 9-year-old boy was indicted.

A McLennan County grand jury on Wednesday charged Jorge Grijaiva Cardona, 42, with injury to a child, a felony with a maximum penalty of two years in a state jail.

In May, Cardona's dog bit an elementary student in the right arm, right leg and rib area while the child rode a go-cart in front of his own house, according to reports.

After the boy's family members rushed to help him and chased the dog away, he was treated at a local hospital and released.

Cardona, who was "heavily intoxicated" when investigators talked to him that afternoon, was on his porch drinking beer during the attack, according to police reports.

Cardona is charged with acting recklessly by not having the dog restrained and by not coming to the boy's aid.

Animal control officers seized the dog, and reports do not indicate what happened to the animal.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: animals; doggieping; dogofpeace; holdmuhbeer; maul; pets; pitbull
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: manwiththehands
I was with a group of friends at a local park... when a guy passed us walking his Pit Bull
I sarcastically said, "Oh, a Pit Bull. Let's see if he can swim ... with a few bricks tied to him!"
We all laughed
Image hosted by TinyPic.com
41 posted on 10/14/2005 6:47:44 AM PDT by kanawa (My dog is a very special gift from God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

You've made your point. You own a pit bull. I understand. You have no sense of humor about the topic at hand. Now go play with your dog. :)


42 posted on 10/14/2005 6:55:10 AM PDT by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

I was totally unaware of the danger to society brought on by the Cocker Spaniels. The media must be supressing the stories about vicious Cocker jaws crushing human windpipes.



43 posted on 10/14/2005 7:04:21 AM PDT by Wristpin ( Varitek says to A-Rod: "We don't throw at .260 hitters.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands
You have no sense of humor about the topic at hand

Which topic is that?
Dog bites?...Nope no sense of humor there.
Irresponsible dog owners?...Nope no sense of humor there.
Distorted and sensationalized media reports whipping up hysteria...Nope no sense of humor there.
Politicians playing on peoples fears to enact ineffective and intrusive legislation that does nothing to curb dog bites and irresponsible ownership?...Nope no sense of humor there.
Bullies who think it's fun to verbally harrass and threatened responsible dog owners based on what they think is a 'pit bull'?...Nope no sense of humor there either.
(You seem to think bullying in particular is funny. Trying reading some of these accounts and see if you still find it funny)

44 posted on 10/14/2005 12:17:16 PM PDT by kanawa (My dog is a very special gift from God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
The media must be supressing the stories about vicious Cocker jaws crushing human windpipes.

Ignoring for now the permanent disfiguration that a bite from any dog breed can inflict upon a child let me say that in the 2 daily reports I get from google with the keywords 'pitbull attack' and 'dog attack' to the best of my knowledge I have never seen any report of crushed windpipes.

Perhaps if I included the term 'strawman' I might get some results.

45 posted on 10/14/2005 12:24:01 PM PDT by kanawa (My dog is a very special gift from God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; kanawa

Well given the hysteria it would not suprise me if they tried to sterilize pit owners too. After all what kind of person could possibly want to own this American iconic breed known, prior to the mass hysteria, for its playfulness, smile, independance,tenacity, and tolerance.

Did you see the many pictures of happy, gentle rescued pits and pit mixes out of NOLA?


46 posted on 10/14/2005 1:31:51 PM PDT by dervish (no excuses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: just deserts

It seems clear from the story that the owner was not a poster child of humanity.

What aside from the desire to pin this on the bad nature of pits would lead anyone to look further than the obviously excellent source of this attack, a creepy owner.


47 posted on 10/14/2005 1:36:29 PM PDT by dervish (no excuses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dervish
Did you see the many pictures of happy, gentle rescued pits and pit mixes out of NOLA?

No. But I did read of police shooting packs of pit bulls and pit mixes who were attacking people, and other dogs, and eating cadavers.

I have no use for pit bulls, a dog whose jaws can kill another dog or a child, or even some adults with one snap. They are time bombs, AFAIC, the only question being when will they go off?

With all the breeds out there which are proven to be non-threatening and can't kill with one snap of its jaws, why on earth would anybody choose a pit bull?

48 posted on 10/14/2005 1:50:55 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dervish
What aside from the desire to pin this on the bad nature of pits would lead anyone to look further than the obviously excellent source of this attack, a creepy owner

Even a creepy owner couldn't get my Bichon Frises to attack and maul a nine-year old kid.

Shoot a person with a .22 and he will likely live through it.

A shot from a .45 is nearly always fatal.

49 posted on 10/14/2005 1:53:55 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
With all the breeds out there which are proven to be non-threatening and can't kill with one snap of its jaws, why on earth would anybody choose a pit bull?

It's a macho thing. Some people can't afford a Corvette.

50 posted on 10/14/2005 1:55:29 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Key word "my" Bichon Frisees. Not any Bichon Frisees.

So you are a good owner. I would expect no less. Your dogs in another's hands, that's a hypothetical for which your claims of certainty leave me unconvinced.


51 posted on 10/14/2005 1:59:59 PM PDT by dervish (no excuses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Lots of breeds not just Pits are .45's. Do you want to ban them all?


52 posted on 10/14/2005 2:03:38 PM PDT by dervish (no excuses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Can you add drunk and disorderly to the charges?


53 posted on 10/14/2005 2:28:48 PM PDT by tob2 (Old Fossil and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

I can't wait until we sterilize all irresponsible dog owners.


54 posted on 10/14/2005 2:43:49 PM PDT by scoopscandal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

I knew it wouldn't take long. You just don't have any defense for these dogs. That's my opinion. If one's in my neighborhood and gets loose, and it gives me a half second of doubt as to its intentions to be violent, and it's on or near my property, it's 9mm Black Talon hollowpoint justice time. It is my personal opinion that these dogs cannot be trusted, and too many owners cannot be trusted to be responsible. I will err on the side of safety for my children.


55 posted on 10/14/2005 2:56:31 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tob2

Can you add drunk and disorderly to the charges?

***

As I said, my knowledge of criminal law is minute, so something like that would be up to the legal minds in the DA's office. Personally, I would add as many charges as I could, preferably felony charges -- try to get that sentence upped to more than a 2-year max. I don't know about the jurisdiction where this incident occurred -- but where I live, drunk and disorderly is generally a misdemeanor -- misdemeanors don't do anything to increase the severity of the sentence.

Just seems to me that a possible two years maximum sentence is not enough for this heartless clod.


56 posted on 10/14/2005 2:57:39 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RavenATB
It's long past time to ban the breed, nationally.

And the laws that attempt to do so are based on looks, much like 'assault rifles'. The bans go way too far (and end up in idiocy), if you accept the premise that the specific breed should be banned.

PBTs make me nervous, and no, I don't trust them. But, the solutions being proposed are rotten.

57 posted on 10/14/2005 3:03:23 PM PDT by technochick99 (Firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: kanawa
My apologies. Let me rephrase that: I don't expect you to have a sense of humor about the topic at hand. You've made your point.
58 posted on 10/14/2005 6:08:52 PM PDT by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
"And the laws that attempt to do so are based on looks, much like 'assault rifles'."

"Assault rifles" do not attack children, on their own, without any input/direction from a human. PBTs need no guidance to attack, multi late and kill, as we've seen far too many times in recent years.

If this society placed the appropriate value on the lives of innocent children, we'd have banned pit bulls many years ago.
59 posted on 10/14/2005 8:16:34 PM PDT by RavenATB (Patton was right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: RavenATB

My point, which you seemed to have completely missed, is that the laws are based on LOOKS and appearances. This is beyond ridiculous.


60 posted on 10/15/2005 9:35:18 AM PDT by technochick99 (Firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson