Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Sidesteps Cheney Questions
ABCNews.com ^ | 10/25/05 | AP

Posted on 10/25/2005 5:49:06 PM PDT by Jean S

White House Sidesteps Cheney Questions

White House Turns Aside Questions on Whether Cheney Passed to Aide CIA Officer's Identity

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The White House on Tuesday sidestepped questions about whether Vice President Dick Cheney passed on to his top aide the identity of a CIA officer central to a federal grand jury probe.

Notes in the hands of a federal prosecutor suggest that Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, first heard of the CIA officer from Cheney himself, The New York Times reported in Tuesday's editions.

A federal prosecutor is investigating whether the officer's identity was improperly disclosed.

The Times said notes of a previously undisclosed June 12, 2003, conversation between Libby and Cheney appear to differ from Libby's grand jury testimony that he first heard of Valerie Plame from journalists.

"This is a question relating to an ongoing investigation and we're not having any further comment on the investigation while it's ongoing," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.

Pressed about Cheney's knowledge about the CIA officer, McClellan said: "I think you're prejudging things and speculating and we're not going to prejudge or speculate about things."

McClellan said Cheney who participated in a morning video conference on the Florida hurricane from Wyoming, where he is speaking at a University of Wyoming dinner tonight is doing a "great job" as vice president. The spokesman also said Cheney's public comments have always been truthful.

The New York Times identified its sources in the story as lawyers involved in the case.

Libby has emerged at the center of Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's criminal investigation in recent weeks because of the Cheney aide's conversations about Plame with Times reporter Judith Miller.

Miller said Libby spoke to her about Plame and her husband, Bush administration critic Joseph Wilson, on three occasions although not necessarily by name and without indicating he knew she was undercover.

Libby's notes show that Cheney knew Plame worked at the CIA more than a month before her identity was publicly exposed by columnist Robert Novak.

At the time of the Cheney-Libby conversation, Wilson had been referred to but not by name in the Times and on the morning of June 12, 2003 on the front page of The Washington Post.

The Times reported that Libby's notes indicate Cheney got his information about Wilson from then-CIA Director George Tenet, but said there was no indication he knew her name.

The notes also contain no suggestion that Cheney or Libby knew at the time of their conversation of Plame's undercover status or that her identity was classified, the paper said.

Disclosing the identify of a covert CIA agent can be a crime, but only if the person who discloses it knows the agent is classified as working undercover.

The Times quoted lawyers involved in the case as saying they had no indication Fitzgerald was considering charging Cheney with a crime.

But the paper said any efforts by Libby to steer investigators away from his conversation with Cheney might be viewed by a prosecutor as attempt to impede the inquiry, which could be a crime.

According to a former intelligence official close to Tenet, the former CIA chief has not been in touch with Fitzgerald's staff for more than 15 months and was not asked to testify before the grand jury even though he was interviewed by Fitzgerald and his staff.

The official told the Times that Tenet declined to comment on the investigation.

Libby's lawyer, Joseph Tate, did not return phone calls and e-mail to his office.

Fitzgerald is expected to decide this week whether to seek criminal indictments in the case. Lawyers involved in the case have said Libby and Karl Rove, President Bush's senior adviser, both face the possibility of indictment. McClellan said both Rove and Libby were at work on Tuesday.

Fitzgerald questioned Cheney under oath more than a year ago, but it is not known what the vice president told the prosecutor.

Cheney has said little in public about what he knew. In September 2003, he told NBC he did not know Wilson or who sent him on a trip to Niger in 2002 to check into intelligence some of it later deemed unreliable that Iraq may have been seeking to buy uranium there.

"I don't know who sent Joe Wilson. He never submitted a report that I ever saw when he came back," Cheney said at the time. "... I don't know Mr. Wilson. I probably shouldn't judge him. I have no idea who hired him."

Asked Tuesday whether Cheney always tells the truth to the public, McClellan said, "Yes."

"Frankly I think it's a ridiculous question," he said. "The vice president, like the president, is a straightforward plainspoken person."

The Cheney-Libby conversation occurred the same day that The Washington Post published a front-page story about the CIA sending a retired diplomat to Africa, where he was unable to corroborate intelligence that Iraq was trying to acquire uranium yellowcake from Niger. The diplomat was Wilson.

A year after Wilson's trip, President Bush cited British intelligence in his State of the Union address as suggesting that Iraq was pursuing uranium in Africa.



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cheney; cialeak

1 posted on 10/25/2005 5:49:07 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS

But can we believe ABC?


2 posted on 10/25/2005 5:49:48 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

ABC sidesteps facts.


3 posted on 10/25/2005 5:51:02 PM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

They double sourced it. And copied it word for word.


4 posted on 10/25/2005 5:52:38 PM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

LOL! Another funny title from the Rat media. They will be so disappointed.


5 posted on 10/25/2005 5:57:14 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

And what if he did?

It is not illegal for the V.P to discuss the name of a C.I.A employee with his C.O.S.

Typical N.Y Slimes.


6 posted on 10/25/2005 5:58:01 PM PDT by Redcoat LI (Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

Exactly. Tell the whole story, idiots.


7 posted on 10/25/2005 5:58:47 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

With Dems it's "declines to respond to" with Republicans it's "sidesteps."


8 posted on 10/25/2005 6:24:52 PM PDT by jwalburg (If I have not seen as far as others, it is because of the giants standing on my shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

I now have no doubt that there will be no indictments.
This White House is so shrewd it's unbelievable.


9 posted on 10/25/2005 6:28:39 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Libby's notes show that Cheney knew Plame worked at the CIA more than a month before her identity was publicly exposed by columnist Robert Novak.

Yes but Wilson was blabbering to reporters two months before Novaks article. Also, Libbys notes don't show that Cheney knew the wife of Joe Wilson as being named Valerie Plame.

10 posted on 10/25/2005 6:33:03 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Welcome to Already Been Contradicted News
11 posted on 10/25/2005 6:44:35 PM PDT by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

No, we can't trust ABC. An ABC reporter told the White House that Libby had been indicted today. It's desperation time for the Rats.


12 posted on 10/25/2005 6:45:12 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
The Times reported that Libby's notes indicate Cheney got his information about Wilson from then-CIA Director George Tenet, but said there was no indication he knew her name. The notes also contain no suggestion that Cheney or Libby knew at the time of their conversation of Plame's undercover status or that her identity was classified, the paper said. Disclosing the identify of a covert CIA agent can be a crime, but only if the person who discloses it knows the agent is classified as working undercover.

That makes no sense.
13 posted on 10/25/2005 7:12:28 PM PDT by Perdogg ("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Dewey Defeats Truman!


14 posted on 10/25/2005 7:14:51 PM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301
libby's notes . this leak thing is a fiasco. have they seen these notes? who provided them with this info? know matter what happens if this is the level of competition is will collapse under it's own ineptness.
15 posted on 10/25/2005 7:37:03 PM PDT by fantom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Believe ABC?

Surely you jest.

This has Hillary's paw prints all over it. Claim corruption, create corruption, cause corruption.

From the Alinsky playbook: it doesn't have to be true. You just have to say it loudly enough with conviction, and, say it all the time.

Words of wisdom from the perception is reality loons.


16 posted on 10/25/2005 7:47:38 PM PDT by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch. NOT to be schiavoed, greered, or felosed as a patient)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

What ever happened with all the side stepping of Kerry blowing the cover of CIA secret operative Fulton Armstrong during confirmation hearings for U.N. ambassador nominee John Bolton?


17 posted on 10/25/2005 8:28:46 PM PDT by fuyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fuyb

but but but thats different.............. somehow


18 posted on 10/25/2005 10:16:24 PM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson