Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vote for Harriet!!!! (The dubious professional distinctions of Harriet Miers.)
Slate Magazine ^ | Tuesday, Oct. 25, 2005 | Mark Obie

Posted on 10/27/2005 12:40:24 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
That Slate article lays waste to the whole bar assocciation and head-of-law-firm thing.

Shorn of the merits of these non-qualifications, Miers is even more nakely a Texas crony.

Whoops, she's broken another glass ceiling there. She's a Good Ol' Boy.

Isn't that just super?
81 posted on 10/27/2005 5:46:02 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
As Arlen "Not Proven" Specter is wont to say, Super-Duper!
82 posted on 10/27/2005 5:57:12 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
I suggest to save their fingers, why not just point Miers moonbots to this handy shorthand, instead of wasting their time typing and wasting our time reading the same tired 'arguments?'

1) She has real world experience, you Elitist!
2) You just hate women, you Sexist!
3) You just never liked the President, you Bush-Hater!
4) THIS Republican President Bush has never appointed a non-conservative to the SCOTUS as far as you know, so trust Bush, you Traitor!
5) You never supported Bush anyway, you Third Party Freak!
6) You never supported Bush anyway, You Buchananite Buckethead!
7) You never supported Bush anyway, You Tancredoite Nutjob!
8) You never supported Bush anyway, You Border Controlling Racist!
9) Let her have her say in the hearings instead of using her actual words against her, you dumb Dittohead, you!
10) You didn't fight Ginsburg like this, roll over now, too!
11) You're only helping the Democrats, you closet liberal!
12) You're only a small group according to the polls, we're the large group, so shut up!
13) We SAID she was an Evangelical--what more do you want, you nit-picking God-hater!?!?
14) Mike Brown likes her, and anyone who doesn't is a leftist tool!
15) But Bush has promised [insert promise of future bone, e.g., border control, budgetary restraint, etc., here] out to the conservatives, can't they give up the most important branch of the government to his most favoritest pal?
16) She can bowl, dammit!

So now, if there is a post by a Miers skeptic, say, where they post Miers' actual words and this strikes the moonbots' as grounds for character assassination or some other similar form of 'argument,' they just type in the numbers as if they were hangin' at the Automat. Here's an example of how this would work:

LibertarianInExile: In two speeches, Ms. Miers used the usual pro-choice code words about abortion, and she used Janet Reno and Justice Ginsburg as examples of female success stories!

Miers fan: #1! #2! #9! #3! #5!

With the ad hominem attacks all properly classified this way, the ubiquitous Miers threads and threadjackings will probably not be as NEARLY distracting from the usual FR experience, wherein we make fun of stupid Democrat tricks and all act like we're conservatives!

83 posted on 10/27/2005 6:09:18 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile (Miers: A meticulous, detail-oriented woman...who forgets to pay her bar dues twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny; Do not dub me shapka broham; Cboldt

Ping to 83 (and for the amusement of your ping lists).

Thanks to Cboldt for the idea.


84 posted on 10/27/2005 6:11:30 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile (Miers: A meticulous, detail-oriented woman...who forgets to pay her bar dues twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

"Well, there is mediocrity, and then there are such things as outstanding mediocrity and mediocre mediocrity, too. Further, we ought to consider that somebody brilliant could indeed jump out of the judicial gown and desolate the whole country - one never knows what to expect of them. Thus a plodding mediocrity is a much safer choice. Besides, the very existence and presence of a mediocrity as a reference point gives a warm and pleasant feeling of superiority to all wannabe geniuses."

Don't know whether to laugh of cry.


85 posted on 10/27/2005 6:40:16 AM PDT by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Plus, the year Ms. Miers was elected, the powers-that-be in the State Bar decided it was time for a woman president and chose two women as the candidates.


86 posted on 10/27/2005 6:44:58 AM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: quesney
Why not try both?

:&)

87 posted on 10/27/2005 6:53:05 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
The last person to withdraw nomination because of lack of support from the president's own party was Douglas Ginsburg. That nomination wrought Anthony Kennedy.

Thanks a whole bunch.

88 posted on 10/27/2005 7:01:53 AM PDT by AmishDude (Welcome to the judicial oligarchy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
The Ginsburg nomination was withdrawn for the same reason that Tower went down in flames during Bush 41, and that Chavez was pulled by Bush 43, i.e. the administration buckled to pressure.

It had nothing to do with opposition from the right.

89 posted on 10/27/2005 7:03:59 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

>> Hopefully, this hasn't already been posted. <<

I have rarely been so happy to see an article that is so plainly obselete. :^D Thanks for your pings... it's the thought that counts ;^)


90 posted on 10/27/2005 7:59:31 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Got it in just under the wire!

^____^

91 posted on 10/27/2005 8:05:03 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Now lyin about it , all of this is ir-relephant now.


92 posted on 10/27/2005 9:07:55 AM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: quesney
"Don't know whether to laugh of cry."
Try both at the same time - or neither, for it was but a statement of a sad but profound truth.
93 posted on 10/27/2005 9:10:44 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Giorgio Boschetto, The Godfather, took bad advice from his normally trustworthy Consigliere, Karl Rove. He should have known not to show too much "respect" to Don Barzini, aka Harry Reid of Nevada.

Here's hoping they have a "sit down" with the Nevada Senator in Lake Tahoe.

94 posted on 10/27/2005 9:12:52 AM PDT by Clemenza (Gentlemen, Behold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

"Try both at the same time - or neither, for it was but a statement of a sad but profound truth."

Indeed it was. What a world.


95 posted on 10/27/2005 9:29:53 AM PDT by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
WithdrawL symptoms???

:_)

96 posted on 10/27/2005 10:07:07 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Beyond this Miers thing. The Bush presidency is coming unraveled. Prior to Miers his position was precarious, now it it in near free fall. His arrogance has finally caught up with him. His backing for the Iraq war will be the next to go.

ForbushManSHAZAAM!!! "Fear not! Help has arrived! The grownups have taken charge!"

"IRRRRRVINGGGGG!"

"Coming mother..."

97 posted on 10/27/2005 1:56:50 PM PDT by Anthem (The only 20th century advance in the science of government was to tax a little less to take more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

Fantastic quote.

Miers is a glorified hall monitor.


98 posted on 10/27/2005 7:04:56 PM PDT by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Urbane_Guerilla
You're right.

Before the Bork rave the only time I had heard or seen his name mentioned-in relation to a possible Supreme Court vacancy-was in a brief article posted on Slate.

99 posted on 10/27/2005 7:48:24 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
Miers fan: #1! #2! #9! #3! #5!

That list is a riot.

Keep it handy, just in case. But I'm hoping 'I' do the right thing with the next nominee so we don't have a repeat.
100 posted on 10/27/2005 10:42:04 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson