Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
I do not know why people are trumpeting the fact that Ms. Miers was president of the State Bar as a reason to support her nomination for the Supreme Court.

Presidency of the Texas State Bar is not an award given to the best lawyer in the State of Texas. It is the culmination of years of glad-handing and back-slapping (with a dash of tokenism) in a mutual admiration society. Texas State Bar elections are most akin to the old Soviet elections. The ruling claque selects two candidates (who in certain years meet either a gender or a minority requirement) and then the hoi polloi can select among the chosen two.

As a caveat, I think I did vote for Ms. Miers (in one of the last years before I stopped voting in State Bar elections) because she was only a mushy mod-liberal while her chosen opponent was a hard-core liberal.

66 posted on 10/27/2005 5:10:38 AM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: writmeister
I do not know why people are trumpeting the fact that Ms. Miers was president of the State Bar as a reason to support her nomination for the Supreme Court.

Not merely that she was president of the association, but that she was the first woman to hold that post.

She is a poster child for women's equal rights. The WH is playing to the female wing of its support constituency (as well as the evangelical wing and party-faithful wing). Of course, there is some overlap in those constituency groups, and none of them are "all in" or "all out."

79 posted on 10/27/2005 5:38:44 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson