Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhombus

I don't see how it's so difficult to "sell" an originalist to the American public, MSM aside.

I expect 80% of the U.S. citizenry were not happy with the emminant domain (Lelo?) decision, at least the 80% who understood it. Even Libs are opposed to "big business" having legal power to take away private homes.

How hard can it be to paint Souter et al as opposed to private property rights? And Scalia et al as champions of liberty? Throw in Janice Rogers Brown, and point out who's side of this debate she is on.

Good grief, it seems it's always about whether or not lib women want to kill their kids in the womb, to both sides of the political spectrum. Seems to me there are other issues to fight (and win) on. If JRB happens to be pro-life, pro-2A, so much the better, eh?

I can't believe we're not hammering this property rights thing down the throat of every lib pundit and "newscaster", in this SC nominee issue. Unless of course.... half the pubs actually supported the Lelo decision.. argh.


1,415 posted on 10/27/2005 8:08:48 AM PDT by Hard Way (Razor nothin'. I'm firing up Occam's Chain Saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 744 | View Replies ]


To: Hard Way
I can't believe we're not hammering this property rights thing down the throat of every lib pundit and "newscaster", in this SC nominee issue.

I talked with a liberal friend the other day who thought it was conservatives who pushed the "steal your property for a condo developer" ruling through the SC. We need to hammer this issue. We're on the right side, they're not. Republicans can pick up new voters on this issue.

The MSM isn't playing it large for a reason - and that reason is it hurts dems.

1,456 posted on 10/27/2005 8:14:40 AM PDT by GOPJ (NYT: How many times do you ask for an error to be corrected before the "error" becomes a "lie"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1415 | View Replies ]

To: Hard Way
Good grief, it seems it's always about whether or not lib women want to kill their kids in the womb, to both sides of the political spectrum. Seems to me there are other issues to fight (and win) on. If JRB happens to be pro-life, pro-2A, so much the better, eh? I can't believe we're not hammering this property rights thing down the throat of every lib pundit and "newscaster", in this SC nominee issue. Unless of course.... half the pubs actually supported the Lelo decision.. argh.

You touch on two very important issues. First, the latter. Yes the property rights issue shoud be hammered down their throats. Why are all the good PR people Rats? We just don't deomogogue very well.

Second the abortion issue. It's still very big especially with soccer moms and their naughty daughters. Bush sidestepped the issue when he ran in 2000. He said something about changing people's hearts and avoided any pledge to change laws - this was enough to convince enough soccer moms who otherwise would have voted for Gore. Roberts did the same thing when he said Roe was settled law. The biggest fear out there is that a bunch of "crazed religious nuts" are going to pass a law outlawing abortion. And back in 2000, after the Senate caved on impeachment and the liberals made the whole issue about sex, a Republican hard-liner on abortion was never going to be elected.

I agree there are more important things out there but not to so many on both the left and the right.

1,587 posted on 10/27/2005 8:29:36 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1415 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson