Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nameless

Why on earth are you trolling a Miers thread trying to start a religious argument? You're not going to convince theists that there is no God, and they aren't going to convince you that He exists. The people on the sidelines will do what they will; no one will become an atheist to impress you.

Please go find a relevant thread to show how much smarter you are than everyone else.


2,504 posted on 10/27/2005 11:41:45 AM PDT by Warren_Piece (Nashville, TN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2486 | View Replies ]


To: Warren_Piece
I stand by my statement that our fast falling, allegedly conservative, President is either stupid or crazy to think that being a born-again Christian is a qualification for the SC. Some took issue with use of the word zealot and the digression proceeded from that. I received dire warnings of what, I'm not sure... but I think it was of being struck by lightening and/or being sent to Hell. Amusing!

My original post below:

Whose fault is that? The President nominated an utterly unqualified Miers simply because she was his personal legal counsel and she shares his religious zealotry. Can you say Nepotism? I voted for George W. Bush twice, I held signs for him and worked hard to convince friends, neighbors and family to vote for him. I would do it again if only because what the Democrat Party offered was far worse. The President is no conservative and I voted for the lesser of two evils, it now seems. I strongly support his strategic vision for the War on Terror, but I was terribly disappointed in his seeming inability to adequately explain it during the campaign and since. The man babbles like an idiot! I know he is not an idiot, but he sounds like one. When leading the greatest nation on earth, a President needs to clearly outline his plan for policies foreign and domestic and be able to explain and defend them. I am insulted that he seemed to think that myself and other thoughtful, conservative, Republican voters would believe everything is all right if only we could be reassured that Miers volunteered for Meals On Wheels and is a fundamentalist Christian. I am unhappy with the flawed legal reasoning that led to Roe v. Wade, but it is emphatically not the most important issue facing the court and unlikely to be overturned in the foreseeable future. I would be perfectly happy to let each state decide its own policy by popular vote and allow or disallow abortion on a state by state basis. I fear that legal lightweights like Miers would like to impose different, but equally onerous, extra-Constitutional mandates on us all. Rather than being reassured by the President's description of Miers, I found suspicions raised in my mind. I don't want a religious zealot imposing the Christian equivalent of Muslim Sharia on me any more than I want Ruth Bader Ginsberg imposing the values of the lunatic ACLU left.
3,117 posted on 10/27/2005 6:36:41 PM PDT by Nameless (I am the Bodhisattva of Tautological Truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2504 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson