Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper

Whether you like this woman or not, she has taken an incredible amount of abuse.


26 posted on 10/27/2005 5:57:53 AM PDT by jporcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jporcus

Scalia just said that he would not let himself be nominated today because of the personal abuse a nominee gets.


40 posted on 10/27/2005 5:58:53 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: jporcus
Not only has she taken an incredible amount of abuse--the bigger issue is that the president is badly wounded by this, and it will take it's toll on him and his administration.

There have been times during the Bush presidency that have made me cringe and shake my head in wonder. In some ways, he has been his biggest enemy. Nominating Ms Miers is just the latest example.

112 posted on 10/27/2005 6:02:24 AM PDT by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: jporcus

Yes, this has got to be incredibly embarassing to all involved. I feel sorry for her.


217 posted on 10/27/2005 6:08:28 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (( ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: jporcus; flashbunny; sinkspur; NapkinUser
Whether you like this woman or not, she has taken an incredible amount of abuse.

So have her supporters.

And from a noob no less.

298 posted on 10/27/2005 6:12:56 AM PDT by SittinYonder (Flea, feather, bird, egg, nest, twig, branch, limb, tree, and the bog down in the valley - o.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: jporcus
Whether you like this woman or not, she has taken an incredible amount of abuse.

Amen to that.

386 posted on 10/27/2005 6:17:40 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: jporcus
That's a load of dung. She's been picked for a lifetime appointment to the most important court in the land. Her writings point to something other than conservatism, she can't talk constitutional law and she screwed up her first questionnaire so bad that it had to be done over. She was also late with the do over, but now that she has pulled her nomination I can see why. Follow conservatism first, and individuals second. Philosophy over personality for those of you who don't know or read history.
451 posted on 10/27/2005 6:22:31 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: jporcus
I won the bet with the hubby. I felt that if Harriett was the person President Bush thought she was, that she would not let the President and his family go through the process that would hurt his Presidency or divide the Country.

God Bless Harriett Miers. IMHO, she is everything President Bush, in his heart, felt she was as a person and an American!
524 posted on 10/27/2005 6:28:00 AM PDT by not2worry (What Goes Around Comes Around!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: jporcus

>> Whether you like this woman or not, she has taken an incredible amount of abuse. <<

All of it hard earned. Go review my vanities... you'll see I defended her for some time, until I was overwhelmed by the stench.


1,014 posted on 10/27/2005 7:14:22 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: jporcus
"Whether you like this woman or not, she has taken an incredible amount of abuse."

You have a gift for understatement. I've never been ashamed of being a conservative before this venomfest began. I am now.

1,359 posted on 10/27/2005 8:01:57 AM PDT by cake_crumb (They're Not Conservative Enough! Get a Rope so We Can Hang Ourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: jporcus
"Whether you like this woman or not, she has taken an incredible amount of abuse."

I did not hear any personal abuse heaped upon her. I heard the President's base insist that he nominate someone who was clearly in the mold he promised. By public record (of which there wasn't one), Harriet Miers did not meet the President's own test.

We were rightfully worried about another Souter.

That didn't amount to personal or inaccurate attacks to my knowledge.

1,380 posted on 10/27/2005 8:04:28 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie ("Avoid novelties, for every novelty is an innovation, and every innovation is an error. " - Mohammed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: jporcus
Whether you like this woman or not, she has taken an incredible amount of abuse.

It was nothing personal ... and, she herself has not been abused. Her writings, her speech, her invovlement in IOLTA, and her unsuitability to become a justice of the SCOTUS have been properly scorned. Her own mediocrity prevented her seeing just how unsuitable she would have been.

Personally, I have no animus toward her ... and wish her all the best in her future endeavors. I am just relieved and very, very happy that she will not be sitting on the SCOTUS for the rest of her life [and mine].

1,734 posted on 10/27/2005 8:54:12 AM PDT by caryatid (All good things which exist are the fruits of originality. [John Stuart Mill])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: jporcus

It was not abuse to discuss her record - and I have not heard one person attack her personally. (Though perhaps it happened from a few.)

Meyers was set up and out of her depth. I have sympathy for that treatment, but in no way was she qualified to serve at the proposed level. President Bush was not careful in his nomination, and it caused problems.


2,677 posted on 10/27/2005 12:55:32 PM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson