Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
It seemed a sensible thing to do, to try and find a woman who could replace a woman.

Unfortunately, finding a woman who does not think like a woman is a very hard project.

I really think that Bush thought he was doing the right thing in Miers. That he was picking a woman who would work hard to team up with Scalia, as most of her views, the ones I have read, seem to echo his, but in different phrasing, a woman's phrasing, I thought.......

I don't mean to be sexist or in any way misogynistic, but we don't know what Bush thought of the others and who had withdrawn from consideration prior to the pick. We just don't.

I think it was the desire to pick a woman that caused the Miers choice. I think that was the mistake. Not the pick.
3,429 posted on 10/30/2005 12:59:55 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3428 | View Replies ]


To: Cold Heat

I might add, that the sex issue should now be off the table. the next pick, I believe will be a male.

It did not have to be this way, but now it is.


3,430 posted on 10/30/2005 1:03:47 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3429 | View Replies ]

To: Cold Heat

Nope. The gender issue is NOT off the table. Conservatives were accused of being 'anti-woman'. Picking a man would be Smack Number Two at conservatives.
All the more reason we should keep pushing for Janice Rogers Brown, since this process has been tainted. Not only a great mind, but a woman, and a minority to boot.

I hate to bring factors like that up when talking about the Supreme Court [I pulled for Brown prior to this fiasco actually], but we need to put on some armor at this point to shield ourselves from Bush as well as the left.

"I really think that Bush thought he was doing the right thing in Miers."

I disagree. If you are confident in your choice, you don't bypass proper vetting with something this important. When a president bypasses proper vetting, particularly with someone perceived being the president's friend, watch out.

"I don't mean to be sexist or in any way misogynistic, but we don't know what Bush thought of the others and who had withdrawn from consideration prior to the pick. We just don't."

His top choices weren't the conservative top choices. So that is another bad sign.

"I think it was the desire to pick a woman that caused the Miers choice. I think that was the mistake. Not the pick."

Ha! There are many outstanding conservative females who would greatly improve this court. I don't hesitate to bash some women when they sound nuts. I slammed Peggy Noonan one time. I slammed Madam Not-So-Bright and the Wookie [Reno] constantly. I think the lipstick petition of female marines was completely insane. But when I see brilliance, it's not always male. Most notably: Ann Coulter.

Best bet is to call it as you see it. My advice is, look at what people say and do, and try to leave gender out of it.


3,431 posted on 10/31/2005 3:32:27 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (The election phase is just running off the fumes of the primary. And the Primary starts Now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3429 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson