The article omits the fact that evolution can't be tested by the scientific method either. Facts of paleontolgy, biology, biochemistry, etc., are open to interpretation based on the interpreter's preconceptions. The preconception on the part of the evolutionists is called 'naturalism.' When faced with a fact that is totally inexplicable and which probably always will be, they are not permitted to say "God did it", for then they would cease to be scientists and would become (horrors!) theologians. They say, and totally against all reason, "There MUST be a natural explanation for this!
> The article omits the fact that evolution can't be tested by the scientific method either.
Your posting omits the fact that not only *can* evolutionary theory be tested by the scientific method, it *has* *been.*
> When faced with a fact that is totally inexplicable and which probably always will be...
> They say, and totally against all reason, "There MUST be a natural explanation for this!
"totally against all reason?" Wow. So... all the scientific discoveries in all the fields of science ever since the ancient Ionians first came up with the basic scientific method... all a bunch of hooey, huh?
Either you lie or you're just ignorant concerning evolution. I got news for you, it's being done daily all over the planet in laboratories and in the field. The evidence supporting evolution would literlly overwhelm you. Ask PatrickHenry for a list.
Amazing how so many religious conservatives are adopting the language of postmodernism.
As a Christian, it worries me greatly.