Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: Judge Samuel Alito is new choice for Supreme Court nominee
Fox News ^

Posted on 10/31/2005 3:12:28 AM PST by kcvl

Per Fox News...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: alito; antoninscalia; billofrights; bush; catholic; civilrights; constitution; courts; judge; judges; judicialrestraint; justice; miers; newjersey; originalintent; presidentbush; rights; scalito; scotus; supremecourt; uusconstitution; whiningdems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,181-1,2001,201-1,2201,221-1,240 ... 1,901-1,920 next last
To: Allen H

Agreed. We must all show the RINOs no quarter.


1,201 posted on 10/31/2005 7:03:56 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1196 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
It is APPhys who is arguing that one cannot call Meirs unqualified.

You can't say that, it's uncostimatooshunul!

1,202 posted on 10/31/2005 7:04:11 AM PST by Petronski (Cyborg is the greatest blessing I have ever known.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1167 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium

I was disappointed in that also, and REALLY wanted Toomey. Though, I don't think he would have won in the election. PA just doesn't seem ready for a real conservative in that seat. I sure would have liked to have been rid of Specter. That would be a BIG HUGE lib loving RINO out the door. Maybe next time. It would sure be nice. Get Santorum behind the person, then he gets to be the Sr. Sen. from PA, and we get a real Republican in that seat instead of Specter. 8) Everone wins, except the democrats who lose a Republican seat that sided with them half or more of the time.


1,203 posted on 10/31/2005 7:04:54 AM PST by Allen H (Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA! A sad ACLU, for a better America!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1143 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

Up or down vote or...Nuke these weak-kneed wimps! All of them, Rinos or libs, nuke them now, do it for the children! :)


1,204 posted on 10/31/2005 7:05:18 AM PST by Shaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1201 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
I can't understand why people in the conservative movement abandoned the principle that an originalist interpretation of The Constitution was important, ironically during a battle "to install an originalist".

That's obvious.

But you are trying to deny the President his prerogative to nominate and withdraw at will. Heck, even with a confirmed nominee, the President has no Constitutional obligation to appoint.

1,205 posted on 10/31/2005 7:05:36 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1172 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

I wanted her to go to the Senate, never dreamt she'd withdraw. But her hearings were going to be an embarrassing disaster.


1,206 posted on 10/31/2005 7:05:49 AM PST by Petronski (Cyborg is the greatest blessing I have ever known.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1172 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King; AFPhys; rcrngroup; NittanyLion; 1Old Pro; sinkspur; jwalsh07; JRochelle; ...
So you concede that Miers met all the requirements set by the Constitution?

Of course, as is Pee Wee Herman.

Miers was cheerleader, confidant and sounding board for President Bush. Her personality type is keyed into how people really feel - and because of that she's be able to offer a type of counsel others can't.

I was against Miers being confirmed, but she's won my respect for her important spot on the team.

My concern is she would have performed the same function on the SC. Miers might have attached herself to a conservative -- and we'd have an extra conservative justice. Great. Or she could have attached to a liberal..

Powerful men who surround themselves with powerful "truth tellers" only, are handicapped. Bush is smarter than that -- but he confused the mirror she holds up to him, with the person she is... Powerful people needs a "Miers" on the team, and she deserves our respect. Not confirmation...

1,207 posted on 10/31/2005 7:06:07 AM PST by GOPJ (Is every democrat a bent kneed Monica?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1055 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

When we put the best and the brightest people out as our argument instead of "quota" pick, we'll win the argument EVERY time. The country won't be fooled by the MSM.


1,208 posted on 10/31/2005 7:06:39 AM PST by Toidylop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: Allen H
...Yeah it is now time for ALL OF US, ALL CONSERVATIVES to FLOOD the seven RINOs with calls and emails and faxes 24-7. If we're RELENTLESS, VICIOUS, MERCILESS with them, they will all cave and vote for Alito. MUCH pressure is needed from us. We have to all be the surrogate spine for the Republicans in the Senate, for they have no spine of their own and haven't since long before they were the Majority....

I could not agree more! and LET'S DO IT NOW!... WHEN IT'S FRESH... SO THEY get a real picture, real QUICK of what's coming if they do the same little trick of las time

1,209 posted on 10/31/2005 7:06:56 AM PST by ElPatriota (Let's not forget we are all still friends despite our differences :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1196 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium

None, the aforementioned Senators need to be pushed so they won't backdown from the scrum.

It only takes a simple majority to change floor rules...


1,210 posted on 10/31/2005 7:06:57 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (lex orandi, lex credendi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1195 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Sorry.........but I don't think anyone suggesting he nominate a liberal is a 'die-hard supporter.' Either that or they weren't thinking straight and said it in anger.

JMHO.

1,211 posted on 10/31/2005 7:07:25 AM PST by ohioWfan (Take comfort, Friend George, God is with thee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1198 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
If Stevens and Ginsburg are gone the next two years and we get Luddig/Owens/Pryor/Jones type conservatives, like Thomas and Scalia are, and Roberts andAlito appears to be, in just four short years, the SC will have made a radical course correction about 135 degrees to the right, one that has been desperately needed for over half a century. I get goosebumps at the thought of a solid SIX SEAT conservative constructionist group on the SC. And then Kennedy too if he is more conservative like he supposedly was when put on the court.

That would leave just souter and breyer. And it will be a sweet day indeed when souter retires if there is a Republican President. That's a mistake that has been a LONG time in correcting. 8)

1,212 posted on 10/31/2005 7:08:24 AM PST by Allen H (Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA! A sad ACLU, for a better America!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1162 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
Why didn't the president choose someone more on the order of fifty.

We already knew the list was extremely short...plus, this guy was born in 1950 i think...he isnt old by my definition and in 28.

1,213 posted on 10/31/2005 7:08:41 AM PST by smith288 (Peace at all cost makes for tyranny free of charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: puroresu

That's the Gonzales seat.


1,214 posted on 10/31/2005 7:08:46 AM PST by Steve_Stifler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1173 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
"And I would have preferred a woman"

Why?

1,215 posted on 10/31/2005 7:08:50 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 719 | View Replies]

Comment #1,216 Removed by Moderator

To: smith288

Anyone born after I was born is plenty young. ;)


1,217 posted on 10/31/2005 7:10:03 AM PST by ohioWfan (Take comfort, Friend George, God is with thee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1213 | View Replies]

To: LS

See post #429


1,218 posted on 10/31/2005 7:10:10 AM PST by johnny7 (“What now? Let me tell you what now.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

I hope you're right. In recent years kennedy has been WAY too concerned with his legacy and not near as concerned enough about doing what the Constitution says. He reads what the media says about him too much. If having Roberts and Alito on the court helps make kennedy more conservative by proxy of their presence, then that is a firm five, and a MAJOR swing, which is what I've thought it would be having o'conner off the bench. She was a moderate at best. No conservative in her at all.


1,219 posted on 10/31/2005 7:10:19 AM PST by Allen H (Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA! A sad ACLU, for a better America!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1166 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Because I like to believe Bush promotes women in his administration but I guess we just don't have enough qualified women.


1,220 posted on 10/31/2005 7:11:00 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1215 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,181-1,2001,201-1,2201,221-1,240 ... 1,901-1,920 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson