Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

This isn't exactly a new story. Amnesty and other alleged human rights groups have been saying this for at least a year now.


22 posted on 11/02/2005 6:39:14 AM PST by elc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: elc

There have been allegations that these so-called secret prisons existed, but this is the first detailed quasi-confirmation that they do. I think the leak is coming from the Dems on the Senate Intelligence Committee. I wonder if the secret session of the Senate yesterday touched on this matter and its publication in the WP. I assume Dana Priest contacted various USG official to confirm the story and give them a heads-up about its publication today.


27 posted on 11/02/2005 6:44:10 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: elc
This is an article published on May 4, 2004 Prisoner abuse: What about the other secret U.S. prisons?

"But Guantánamo may not be the worst problem; indeed, it may even be a diversion from more extreme situations. Perhaps out of concern that Guantánamo will eventually be monitored by the U.S. courts, the Bush administration does not hold its most sensitive and high-profile detainees there. Terrorism suspects like Ramzi bin al-Shibh and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed are detained instead in undisclosed locations outside the United States, with no access to Red Cross or other visits."

28 posted on 11/02/2005 6:51:05 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson