Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
Isn't this why?

No. Read my comment #1. That's why.

Not that Saddam wasn't a threat, but does ANYBODY believe Clinton would have bombed Baghdad but for the scheduled impeachment vote?

Clinton thought that threat was so urgent that he had to act on the very day of the vote, without even getting congressional approval (or even informing Congress?

12 posted on 11/02/2005 10:07:14 AM PST by Maceman (Fake but accurate -- and now double-sourced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Maceman

Sorry - I left off the sarcasm tag.


14 posted on 11/02/2005 10:11:05 AM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson