Why should RA's that happen to be "Christian" refrain from Bible Studies??..
Do they not have 1st ammendment liberties too?
Can they not also not only function as RAs for a public U. and still be American citizens (and Christians...?)
Not only that but that also brings up the issue of so called "seperation of church ang state" that is a holy idol to the left, but means totally opposite that they say it does: The first ammendment was NEVER ment to deny American citizens (where ever they may be, Govt, Private, family, ect..) from being able to practice their religion: there are only a few circumstances where religious activity is restricted: say when it violates someone else' liberty, propery or explicit rights! And this circumstance does not do that, so I'd say this is just another example of liberal bias against Americans of (Christian) faith :-(!
No one is saying they should. Just that they shouldn't hold them in the dorms they supervise.
If my employer tells me not to hold Bible study in my office, that has nothing to do with my right to do so in the park or on the sidewalk or in the parking lot.
I'm amazed by the hysteria this thread has spawned. An RA is asked to supervise one building (or one floor, or one wing, whatever). As a condition of his employment, he is told not to teach Bible classes in that one building. One building on the planet. And for that, we get this wailing and moaning and gnashing of teeth?