Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Oooooh! Ain't we tough!

More like a gnat biting a tiger in the ass then bragging as if he slaughtered the beast.

1 posted on 11/03/2005 5:38:33 PM PST by baystaterebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: baystaterebel

It sounds to me that Rumsfeld, as he should, appreciates Galloway's input:



On the way out, the defense secretary said, in parting: "I want you to know that I love soldiers and I care about soldiers. All of us here do." Well, one would hope so.

In parting, Galloway told me, he informed Rumsfeld, “I want you to know that I'm going to keep kicking your butt, to keep you focused.”

Rumsfeld replied, “That's okay, I can take it.”

Two days later now, I asked Joe about Rumsfeld's central belief -- that he was getting the true story on Iraq and the state of the military and Galloway was not.

“Besides talking to people, I get a tremendous amount of e-mail from people in the military and in the Pentagon who read my column and react to it,” he replied. “They are concerned. What I'm hearing is that 99% of these readers are 100% in favor of what I am writing, and ask me to keep at it. Unfortunately, if I am right, the military is in a lot of trouble.”




Galloway's reputation is well earned, and he cares about the troops, and their mission. I think he recognizes that Rumsfeld does too. What more do you want? Rumsfeld has enough "yes men" as anyone in his position is bound to have. He would be stupid not to value some "here's how I see it, like it or lump it" guys like Joe Galloway. In fact he probably wishes he had more.


2 posted on 11/03/2005 5:53:59 PM PST by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ALOHA RONNIE

Thought you might be interested.


3 posted on 11/03/2005 5:54:40 PM PST by kenth (A zot! A zot! My kingdom for a zot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: baystaterebel

I am looking forward to reading Galloway's personal account of this meeting versus this guy's second-hand account clearly written from a certain "point of view".


5 posted on 11/03/2005 5:58:12 PM PST by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: baystaterebel
From the article: "Rumsfeld, of course, has never served in combat himself."

Why "of course"? Don't get it. Oh, of course this is another anti-Bush article/publication.

And then some more snide: On the way out, the defense secretary said, in parting: "I want you to know that I love soldiers and I care about soldiers. All of us here do." Well, one would hope so. [emphasis added]

Excerpt: “Besides talking to people, I get a tremendous amount of e-mail from people in the military and in the Pentagon who read my column and react to it,” he replied. “They are concerned. What I'm hearing is that 99% of these readers are 100% in favor of what I am writing, and ask me to keep at it. Unfortunately, if I am right, the military is in a lot of trouble.” [emphasis added]

This is a typical myopic response, that because the majority of my 2 emails are in favor of what I'm writing, the rest of the military is too. I'm on to something...

What was the point of this article? To praise the writer or to help the military? Sounds like a little gloating and self-glorication. I could be wrong. But I do know, you can't trust E&P with the truth or accuracy of a POV.

Loved the movie.
8 posted on 11/03/2005 6:00:40 PM PST by ElderEdda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: baystaterebel
After graduating from Princeton, Rumsfeld went to AOCS and became a Navy pilot. How dare this $h!t question his gallantry?

He put his ass on the lime in 1950s era jet fighters. A very dangeous job!

9 posted on 11/03/2005 6:04:07 PM PST by robomurph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: baystaterebel; All

.

Two other Veterans of the Battle of the IA DRANG Valley, which took place 40 years ago, exactly:


HAL G. MOORE: The Legacy and Lessons of an American Warrior

http://www.strategyzoneonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14752


RICK RESCORLA: Help honor 911 Lifesaving Hero

http://www.strategyzoneonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24361

.


20 posted on 11/03/2005 6:44:06 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: baystaterebel

Here's Galloway's column on the meeting:

By Joseph L. Galloway, Knight Ridder Newspapers

It was a slide down the toad hole that ended with a bump as I landed in Wonderland: The E Ring office of Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld where the great man waited to do battle with me.

The occasion was an invitation to a private lunch with the secretary, and I knew I was not there to receive the Defense Distinguished Service Medal or a pat on the back. My recent columns on the state of the Army and the conduct of the war in Iraq have not been well received at the uppermost levels in the Pentagon.

The surprise was that four others were joining us: the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine Gen. Peter Pace; the vice chief of staff of the Army, Gen. Richard Cody; the director of the Joint Staff, Lt. Gen. Walter Sharp; and the acting assistant secretary of Defense for Public Affairs, Larry DiRita.

Good! Five to one. I had them surrounded.

Rumsfeld was working at his stand-up desk when I entered. He was cordial and smiling and remained so throughout. He did a fast count and informed me that I was outranked by a grand total of 11 stars on the three generals he had brought in.

Then the battle was joined: "I'm not hearing anything like the things you are writing about," Rumsfeld said.

I responded that it had been my experience that information coming up the chain to someone with Rumsfeld's reputation was often not the whole truth. Him: "Oh, I know that, but I talk to lots of soldiers all the time. Why, I have given over 600 Town Hall meetings and anyone can ask me anything." Uh-huh.

He suggested that perhaps my sources were all retired general officers who had been too long away from what was happening today. I told him that in fact about half my sources were active duty officers and NCOs.

"How about 70-30 or maybe 80-20?" Rumsfeld countered. No, not really, I said. In fact many of them are not only active duty but also work in the Pentagon -- perhaps some even on his staff.

The debate took us to questions of whether the Army was broken, or not. Rumsfeld said, in his opinion, the Army was "light years better than it was four years ago."

I asked whether our strategy and tactics in Iraq made any sense at all when we cannot figure out some better way of fighting than sending the finest troops in the world down the same roads to be blown up by ever improving terrorist bombs. That by so doing we were playing to the enemy's strong suit in this asymmetric war.

Rumsfeld emphatically agreed, saying he had ordered the U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. George Casey, to begin shifting away from that focus on patrolling to a big push to stand up an effective Iraqi defense force last January, and this was now being done.

Rumsfeld said he had told Iraqi leaders that the American forces needed to begin stepping back because the growing casualties were having an impact on American public support for the war "and they understand that and agree with it."

When I asked why would the Army send bill collectors out to pursue soldiers who lost limbs to a bomb or mine because they didn't check in their armor and the equipment on leaving Iraq or Afghanistan, or were dunned or their paychecks docked for overpayment of combat pay and benefits, Cody and Rumsfeld spoke of a Pentagon computer system that had been running on automatic.

They said weeks or even months passed before a wounded soldier who is shipped back to the United States for treatment was marked down as having left Iraq and thus was no longer eligible for combat pay and benefits. Then it automatically began billing that soldier or deducting money owed from his pay.

Now, Rumsfeld said, there is someone at the Landstuhl Medical Center in Germany and at Walter Reed Army hospital in Washington and the Bethesda Naval Hospital who checks every patient into the computer upon arrival so records are accurate.

Pace said he agreed totally with one recent column that decried the apparent return to the use of enemy body counts in Iraq.

Rumsfeld said flatly: "We are NOT going to do body counts."

Me: But you ARE doing body counts and releasing them; been doing it for a year and the frequency is growing. If you don't want to do body counts then stop doing them.

Throughout the discussion the defense secretary took notes when he thought he heard a valid point or criticism. Others at the table winced.

They had visions of a fresh shower of the secretary's famous "snowflakes," memos demanding answers or action or both.

An hour and a bit later as I headed for the door, Rumsfeld detoured me by a small room in his suite of offices. He wanted to show me a letter he found in his late father's belongings, now framed. It was written by Defense Secretary James Forrestal to the elder Rumsfeld, thanking him for his service in the Navy in the Pacific War.

Rumsfeld told me: "My dad was over-age but volunteered for the Navy. A year later he was the deck officer on an aircraft carrier fighting the war in the Pacific."

On the way out the defense secretary said, in parting:

"I want you to know that I love soldiers and I care about soldiers. All of us here do."

I replied that concern for the troops and their welfare and safety were my only purpose "and I intend to keep kicking your butt regularly to make sure you stay focused on that goal."

He grinned and said: "That's all right. I can take it."


28 posted on 11/04/2005 7:22:48 AM PST by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson