Typical. One guy has an affair with an assistant and aborts the baby. So the MSM blames the other guy for womanizing. Meantime, according to Drudge, the New York Times reporter "had the details [but] . . . sat on the details."
They wouldn't want to tell the truth about their good, liberal, abortion loving friend Corzine. They'd rather help the Daily News spread lies about Forrester, by mentioning that he is suspected of sexual escapades but not mentioning that there is no evidence for this charge.
Never let it be said that the Times worried more about printing the news than getting their favorite slime elected to public office.
Exactly -- NY Times isn't even good for the bottom of the bird cage anymore!