To: PhiKapMom
Saturday's edition of THE NEW YORK TIMES reported the incident but ignored the specifics: “But Mr. Corzine did deny a new allegation raised by reporters yesterday regarding another woman.” TIMES reporter David Kocieniewski has been investigating the claims, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT.
"He had the details. He's sat on the details," says a source.
A NYT reporter sat on the details of a scandal that might damage a Dem candidate? I'm shocked!
8 posted on
11/05/2005 9:41:02 AM PST by
Reagan is King
(Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the people doing it)
To: Reagan is King
The Star Ledger endorsed FORRESTER, which was a major suprise...the Times is the only area to openly endorse corzine.
28 posted on
11/05/2005 11:35:20 AM PST by
HHKrepublican_2
(you cant spell liberal without an L an I and an E...If the first ammendment doesnt work, use the 2nd)
To: Reagan is King
The scandle is either false or unprovable, and will probably end up just looking like a Forrester smear.
It'll probably help Corzine more then hurt him. That's the only reason they are reporting it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson