So it has come to the point where we have now rejected God Himself if we have not accepted ID! If Pat is a Creationist then it is rich that he holds in such high esteem an evolving, incohesive philosophical movement that plays coyly with deism, does not endorse Creationism, and, more critically, does not explicitly reject the idea of macro-evolution. Pat's pronouncement is obnoxious!
<< So it has come to the point where we have now rejected God Himself if we have not accepted ID! If Pat is a Creationist then it is rich that he holds in such high esteem an evolving, incohesive philosophical movement that plays coyly with deism, does not endorse Creationism, and, more critically, does not explicitly reject the idea of macro-evolution. >>
Yes, Pat is a creationist. And no -- he does not hold ID in high esteem. Like so many other cretionists, he is just jumping on the ID bandwagon because the attempts to force creationism into the curriculum were shot down in 1987. After ID is shot down, he and the others will just jump on the next bandwagon.
Liars for the Lord don't have to be consistent, you know.