Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sofa King

I have to admit that the defintion of species seems to have become muddied now that we can look at DNA.
susie


141 posted on 11/20/2005 3:42:48 PM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracty theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: brytlea
The thing about the definition of a specie is that there is no natural criteria that it can be based off of. When species A evolves into species B, you wind up with a gradual transition where each generation along the way has more genetic difference between individual organisms of the same generation than those organisms have between themselves and their parents or offspring. What possible criteria could you use to draw a line between the two and say "this is species A and this is species B"? The first member of species B would be infinitely more like the last member of A than it would the last member of B.

When creationists are asking to see speciation happen over the course of a generation or two, they're actually asking for something that goes *against* the theory of evolution.
150 posted on 11/20/2005 3:54:39 PM PST by Sofa King (A wise man uses compromise as an alternative to defeat. A fool uses it as an alternative to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson