Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shortstop
Can someone explain what Woodward's silence has to do with Libby's indictment?

Why should Woodward have to apologise? He didn't lie about anything? Woodward's silence means diddly-squat if he never was asked to testify...It means absolutely nothing!

11 posted on 11/21/2005 5:05:59 AM PST by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sirchtruth
Can someone explain what Woodward's silence has to do with Libby's indictment?

I would like an answer as well, one OTHER than something on this so-called time-line. Libby lied to investigators and again, to the GJ. Even had Woodward made known to Fitzgerald that he had his own WH source, Libby would not have known this ahead of his own testimony.

And contrary to exonerating Libby, Woodward letting the world know that there is yet another person in the administration who was contacting members of the press, it confirms the contention the there was concerted effort in the WH. This new GJ will now hear from Woodward's source, either voluntarily or by subpeona, there will be footage of anyone who enters the building to testify ... we will soon know just who this person is.

35 posted on 11/21/2005 7:03:16 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson