Skip to comments.Bacteria which sense the Earth's magnetic field ("Simple" organisms?)
Posted on 11/22/2005 2:15:15 PM PST by DaveLoneRanger
The entire bacterium is oriented like a compass needle inside the magnetic field. Until now, it was not clear how the cells organise magnetosomes into a stable chain, against their physical tendency to collapse by magnetic attraction. But using modern molecular-genetic and imaging processes, researchers from the Max Planck Institue for Marine Microbiology in Bremen and Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry in Martinsried, Germany have identified the protein responsible for creating the magnetosome chain. The scientists showed that this protein aligns the magnetosomes along a cytoskeletal structure which was previously unknown. This points to evidence that genetics regulate the magnetosome chain exactly. The structure is one of the most complex that has ever been found in bacterial cells. It is comparable to organelles that, until now, scientists had only been familiar with in higher organisms. (Nature, Advanced Online Publication, November 20, 2005). Magnetotactic bacteria are widespread in the mud of marine environments. In their cell interior, they form magnetosomes which are aligned into a chain. The bacteria use them to distinguish "up" from "down" in the Earth's magnetic field, and navigate themselves confidently through layers of water to efficiently find optimal growth conditions. The magnetosomes are made of tiny crystals of the magnetic iron mineral magnetite (Fe3O4) -- only about 50 nanometres in size (one nanometre = one millionth of a millimetre).
To build magnetosomes, the cells do not only have to take up large amounts of iron from their surroundings and, from it, produce special iron oxide. The crystals also have to have a exactly defined number, form, and size, in order to be effective magnetic field sensors. To function optimally, the magnetosome crystals have to be strung into a straight chain inside the cell, thereby summing their magnetic moments. Only such a chain structure allows the magnetosomes to behave together like a compass needle which orients the bacteria inside the relatively weak magnetic field of the Earth. But until now, scientists did not know how magnetosome chains are formed.
The research group of Dr Dirk Schüler at the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology has been investigating magnetosome formation in the magnetotactic bacterium Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense, which the scientists found in the mud of a creek at Greifswald, in the northeast corner of Germany. Recently, the researchers were able to identify the part of the DNA that seemed to carry the entire genetic information required for formation and organisation of magnetosome particles. In this genomic fragment, known as a "magnetosome island", there are at least 25-30 different magnetosome genes, whose exact role had not been known in detail.
The researchers more closely investigated the magnetosome island and its function. They came across a gene, one of whose products (among other magnetosome proteins) is a component of the membrane that encloses every indivudual magnetite crystal. This protein, called MamJ, exhibits an unusually high portion of amino acids, aligned in repeats. MamJ has a remote similarity to proteins which control crystallisation processes in other biominerals, like bones, teeth, otoliths, and mussel shells. Thus, the scientists initially suspected MamJ is responsible for the development of magnetite crystals.
Although it is difficult to cultivate and manipulate Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense in the laboratory, as part of his doctoral work André Scheffel succeeded in removing the relevant gene from the genome. In this way, mutant bacteria were created which were lacking the MamJ protein. The mutants, surprisingly, still developed magnetosome crystals, which resembled the wild type in shape, size, and number. But the sensitivity of the magnetic field sensor function was disrupted; the cells could only orient themselves weakly in the magnetic field. Inspection by an electron microscope showed that the mutants' magnetosome crystals did not build a perfectly organised linear chain -- as the wild type's did -- but rather clumped together into irregularly arranged clusters. (see image 1)
The scientists genetically marked the MamJ protein with the fluorescent reporter protein GFP ("green fluorescent protein") and could thus track the fusion protein in the living bacteria cells. As they suspected, the protein was associated with the magnetosome chain. But microscopy made it apparent that MamJ arranges itself along a filamentous structure which trails like a string through the entire cell. In looking for this structure, the researchers used a new electron microscopic method which was developed in the Department of Molecular Structural Biology at the Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, and which has already helped shed light on many cellular structures and functions.
Cyroelectron tomography makes it possible to analyse structures in detail inside an intact, shock-frozen cell (minus 196 degrees celsius), and to display them in three dimensions, at a resolution of just a few nanometres. In Dr Jürgen Plitzko's research group in Martinsried, Manuela Gruska's doctoral work involved investigating magnetic bacteria cells using this technology, and comparing the wild type with the MamJ mutants. She was able to make visible not only the magnetite crystal, but also the surrounding membrane vesicle, in a resolution never achieved before.
Amazingly, the scientists saw a previously unknown filamentous structure along the magnetosome chain of the wild type cells. It resembled a similar structure which structural biologists from Martinsried had already imaged in three dimensions in other cells. This shed light on the crux of the problem with the magnetosome chain: although in the wild type, the magnetosomes lay like pearls on a string along the filament, in the cells missing MamJ, the empty magnetosome vesicles scattered themselves about. It also explains why, as soon as they grow to a particular size, the magnetic crystals clump together in mutant bacteria.
The scientists speculate that the MamJ protein develops, on one hand, on the surface of the magnetosome, and on the other hand, on the newly-discovered filament. It thus enables a close connection between the magnetosome vesicle and structure. This is further evidence of the diverse functions that cytoskeletal structures in bacteria seem to have, and which, for a long time, have only been known in eukaryotes -- i.e., organisms whose cells have nuclei.
The fact that the chain structure of bacterial nanomagnets is exactly regulated by genetics could also have implications for our understanding of the way higher organisms orient themselves to the magnetic field. We have known for some years that certain animals -- like migratory salmon or homing pigeons -- have magnetite crystal chains in particular tissue. These chains are astoundingly similar to those in bacteria, and possibly develop through a related mechanism.
> Scientists haven't learned half of what there is to know from direct observation about the "simplest" of life's ingredients, and yet they expect us to believe they can be even ballpark on telling us life's origins from the past billion years?
Yep. That's what happens when you examine the evidence accumulated over centuries, and test ideas against experiment.
Not knowing half of what there is to know is a *good* thing. Assuming that the unknowns aren't knowable is for serfs. Assuming that the mere fact that some things are unknowns means that everything else must be wrong is an idea best reserved for the insane.
Well, iron tries to align itself with magnetic fields too.
But then I guess that's just another example of ID.
Gosh, how did we ever overlook that!
Oh, wait ...
On the other hand a mere snap of the fingers.
One wonders whether the author gets any facts right after these simple gaffs.
(one nanometre = one millionth of a millimetre)
Wrong, a nanometer is 1/1000 of a millimeter, therefore one-milllionth of a meter. 100 nanometers is 1/10th of a mm. And why the odd French spelling of "meter"?
"Cyroelectron tomography" == cryo-electron..., cryo meaning ultra-cold; in this case the temperature of liquid nitrogen, 77 K.
Quoting: "Well, iron tries to align itself with magnetic fields too.
But then I guess that's just another example of ID."
Sometimes, under some conditions, sir, sometimes. You will notice that ordinary rust, Fe2O3, has no such tendency. And I do not believe for a moment that any iron atom is "trying" to do anything. It merely responds to natural forces.
Maybe you want to extend ID ('irreducible complexity') to the worlds of the Periodic Table and all of Chemistry? Or maybe you imagine 'gaps' in the Periodic Table, too?
Bacteria have behavior. Quite remarkable for something without a brain nor a nervous system.
I simply do not get the anti-science attitude of so many Christian fundamentalists. Science is what gives us the technological and medical wonders that make our lives easier and healthier.
"Wrong, a nanometer is 1/1000 of a millimeter, therefore one-milllionth of a meter. 100 nanometers is 1/10th of a mm."
A nanometer is 1 billionth of a meter, or 1/1000000 of a millimeter. One millimeter is 1/1000 of a meter.
Christians are not anti-science by any means. The difference is between operational science (observation and experimentation of the present world) and the BELIEF in evolution. There is a vast gap between the ideas and "science" that gave us goo-to-you evolution and the science that gives us nanotechnology.
You're right. Most Christian denominations have become aware of the science research accomplishments of the 18th, 19th, 20th and 21st centuries and accepted evolutionary biology and the multi-billion year age of the earth and universe. Only some have refused to evolve...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.