Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Houmatt
This is logically asinine. You leave people to decide for themselves what is moral and ethical, where you can possibly draw the line? Where are the limits? This philosophy has a nasty little word for it: Anarchy.

That's why were a nation of laws, not of men.

Men are, at the best, fallible...and at the worst, downright evil.

So many people now believe the phrase is freedom FROM religion instead of freedom OF religion, they cannot see that denying Christianity's basic tenements is what has set government free from the straight-jacket in which it was confined.

5 posted on 11/26/2005 1:28:56 PM PST by MamaTexan (I am NOT a 'legal entity', nor am I a *person* as created by `law`!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MamaTexan
So many people now believe the phrase is freedom FROM religion instead of freedom OF religion,

I was not aware of this; could you please provide a citation?

This sounds downright scary.

6 posted on 11/26/2005 1:35:02 PM PST by Houmatt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson