NOW sucks canal water but Planned Parenthood can have good points both directions. There are always risks no matter what you do and the sooner people realize this, the better.
NOW and Planned Parenthood are hand in glove....one continues where the other left off...
..they are not separate entities.
And Planned Parenthood's only point is to get your child pregnant and fork over the money!!
Abortion is their big moneymaker....money, money, money...that's what it is about!
Didn't your earlier post infer that the patch shouldn't be on the market at all because of the very small chance of fatality? That contradicts your risk post to which I am responding. I would not put my sexually active daughter on the patch because it doesn't protect from std's. I would try to figure out why she thinks so little of her body and her self that she would be sexually active at 14, then I would lock her in her room. :) Just from listening to the commercials for the patch she shouldn't be a candidate for the patch. It is meant for women who are in committed relationships where neither one is sleeping around to put the other at risk for an std, not a 14 year old girl.
What risks are associated with staying chaste?
Surely you jest. What GOOD point comes from "planned parenthood", and the likes of Margaret Sanger????????