N.C. judge dismisses voting machine case; vendor may pull out

CentreDaily.com ^ | November 29, 2005 | Staff reporter

[VeniVidiVici]

I'm sure any voting machine would be easy to hack with physical access to it.

[OldFriend]

This entire Diebold issue is nothing but junkola. I have not been following the machinations of the America haters.

No doubt in my mind this is all being formented by Soros and friends.

[Wristpin]

I agree. The Dems are desperately trying to cling to paper. They can come up with wheel barrels full of ballots "found" weeks after the fact, snack on chads and make paper airplanes out of military ballots so that they sail into the trash heap.

I highly doubt Diebold, a leading manufacturer of ATM machines, would risk their business on fielding an easily corruptible vote recording machine.

[OldFriend]

The paper is the only way they can suddenly FIND votes that were not counted earlier.

There is nothing they won't do to steal elections and we must not allow them to prevail in their never ending attempts.

[Knitebane]

That certainly would help their competitors cut back on their R & D.

How?