Maybe some day you will actually accept the notion that science gets to establish its own methods, one part of which is its definitions.
You can't get anywhere in a rational discussion when words are used as rubber bands and twisted all out of shape at a whim, or in order to fudge a point.
The establishment of definitions is not the sole property of science. I assume definitions to be the property of general human convention unless otherwise specified. The definitions you've posted several times are reasonable. While you're listing them, why not include the standard definitions for "intelligence" and "design"? Or are those not germane to the subject at hand?