It depends on to whom you are speaking.
Posted on 12/14/2005 6:38:39 AM PST by Mike Bates
Have you noticed that many news organizations, in honor of former ABC News anchorman Peter Jennings, have embarked on a quit smoking campaign? So why don't our media launch a campaign advising people to quit engaging in the dangerous and addictive homosexual lifestyle? Life-threatening sexually transmitted diseases among homosexuals are on the increase.
SNIP
That's performing a good public service. But let's take this humanitarian impulse one step further. We would suggest that ABC News take on another dangerous practice—homosexuality. The latest reports indicate a rising pattern of sexually transmitted diseases nationwide. The 2005 estimate for syphilis cases is the highest in a decade, and the number of gonorrhea cases will exceed any other year's count since 1993. Federal officials attribute the increases mostly to HIV-positive homosexual men having sex with one another. The practice is called "serosorting."
The practice shows the dangerous and addictive nature of the homosexual lifestyle. As if it wasn't bad enough that the homosexual men are HIV-positive, they simply cannot stop having sex with other men. So they are still having sex, this time with other HIV-positive men. They think this is "responsible" sex. But they are increasing their risk of acquiring other sexually transmitted infections, including new resistant strains of HIV.
(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...
Proudly I say I do not own a one.
I ride a dun and have a passive/aggressive dog that will more than address "Brucey's" tresspass while he runs for the gate.
After Bravo dropped Columbo reruns, I've had no reason to turn to it.
It depends on to whom you are speaking.
"Worse"? You're not being judgmental are you?
I think you meant billions of dollars.
Only if it will make you feel better.
LIEberals can tell US to pull out of Vietnam but never tell Demselves to pull out of the chithole that they embed Demselves into.
Unless those two lesbians look like men, of course. In all seriousness though, exactly what are conservatives against? Homosexuality? Or *male* homosexuality? It seems that there is so much more tolerance for lesbians than gay men; true, lesbians spread far less diseases, but if one says that homosexuality is wrong, and should never be practiced, why would that same person then say "but hot lesbians having sex for my gratification is ok"? Come on now, guys, let's start thinking with our heads (on top of our necks, that is).
Why not make it a gender-neutral "Quit Anal Sex" campaign (since that's the real problem) backed by the medical profession? The targets will still scream, but charges of irrational bigotry would be a lot harder to make.
"Why do these articles about homosexuality (and the replies) almost always focus on homosexual men and don't mention lesbians? Is one worse than the other?"
Maybe it's because I'm a guy, therefore I like girls, but the idea of 2 guys just relly creeps me out more than the idea of 2 girls does. It's just nasty. If it;s 2 hot chicks, it doesn't bother me, I dig hot chicks is all. (*shrug*)
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.