DRUDGE: EXECUTIVE ORDER 12949 (No-warrant searches authorized by Bill Clinton in 1995)

fas,org ^ | 2/9/95 | The White House

[adam_az]

"That was different"

Right! Bush Lied, Clinton didn't! (ha ha ha ha ha ha ha)

[adam_az]

"Wasn't Rockefeller the guy that went to Syria and told them Bush intended to soon order an invasion?"

Y

"Leaky Rockerfeller" doesn't have a ring to it though. We need a better nickname.

[WhiteGuy]

2 wrongs don't make a right.

[BlueMondaySkipper]

The border search exception permits searches at the border of the United States "or its functional equivalent." United States v. Montoya De Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 538 (1985). The idea here is that the United States as a sovereign has a right to inspect stuff entering or exiting the country as a way of protecting its sovereign interests, and that the Fourth Amendment permits such searches.

Wouldn't the spying that Bush has authorized be considered a border search?

[conservativebabe]

Fabulous! thanks for your help.

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

thinkprogress's headline for the day:

Cheney Casts Deciding Vote to Pass Budget That Hammers the Poor

To answer your question, yes, they're wrong. Lying left-wing propagandists usually are.

[notigar]

How?

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

Who?

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

The MediaMatters/Soros lie you're pimping suggests the Clinton EO allows for warrant-less searches outside of the US, not within.

Since when did US courts issue warrants for searches on foreign soil? Since when do our courts have international jurisdiction? Why would Clinton need to issue this EO if it didn't apply to "American persons"?

For anybody following this, pay attention. This is what they do here. They invade threads when the traffic dies down, when they're going to meet as little resistance as possible... and they pollute them with their lies, distortions and propaganda. When nobody responds, it gives the appearance that they've won the debate, when in actuality, they're getting the last word on a dead thread because there's nobody left to respond.

You should all check out the site, the "news" stories they run and the user comments. This is the enemy. This is how they talk, how they act, how they think. And unlike the bulk of militant Muslims, these bastards are in our own backyard.

Anybody who links to or supports anything on mediamatters/thinkprogress is a troll, and I say that with 100% certainty. If you check the site for yourself, you'll see there's no other possibility. These sites are the worst of the worst.

[notigar]

Who says I'm pimping anything you moron? I wrote you all of four words over two posts. You need to increase your dosage or get a hobby.

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

DiscovertheNetworks: A Guide to the Political Left
(the lowdown on thinkprogress.org)

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

Who says I'm pimping anything you moron? I wrote you all of four words over two posts

I say you are.

[notigar]

I'll repeat, maybe you can answer this time. Reading this thread, I saw the argument, asked you if it was wrong, and how. That's it. You answer by way of saying I'm "pimping a lie." When and how did I pimp it, imbecile?

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

Actually, I did answer. Trying reading again.

[notigar]

Maybe, if you could read yourself, you'd see that that post was in response to 211, in which you sent me a only a link in response to my question.

I hope you don't have access to young minds, because you would retard their development.

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

#209 is the response to #207.

#211 was merely a link exposing the Soros/Media Matters story you're pimping.

[notigar]

Did you read your link? Because it doesn't say anything about the spying story, let alone "expose" a liberal response to charges that Clinton and Carter did the same thing.

I wish I could get the time back I wasted reading your posts. Merry Christmas, here's hoping we don't meet again.

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

It exposes the site, not the story. Sorry, I'm working here, the post was rushed. The story and the user comments on it (did you read them?) speak for themselves.

I'm sure I'll see you again, probably at the end of another dead thread.

Merry Christmas.