Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bankruptcy Law backfires on credit card issuers
MSN Money ^

Posted on 12/28/2005 12:43:50 AM PST by SDGOP

An unprecedented spike in filings before reform took effect in fall 2005 is chewing into lenders' bottom lines, and the subsequent lull is showing signs of being short-lived. Bankruptcy attorneys say their caseloads are starting to pick up, and credit counseling agencies -- which provide now-mandatory sessions for consumers who want to file -- say they're seeing significantly more people than they initially predicted.

All this is raising questions about whether lenders will profit as much from the new bill as they hoped.Credit card interest out of control? Find a lower rate.

It wasn't supposed to be this way. The new law contains a “means test” that was supposed to steer higher-income filers toward repayment plans. Lenders expected a rush of consumers trying to beat the bankruptcy deadline, but nothing like the surge that actually occurred. More than 500,000 bankruptcy cases were filed in the two weeks before the law took effect, compared with a normal weekly volume of 30,000 to 35,000. So far this year more than 2 million cases have been filed, 49% more than the same period last year and eclipsing all previous records.

(Excerpt) Read more at moneycentral.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bankruptcy; lookmanosympathy; notbreakingnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-255 next last
To: durasell
Half of all U.S. bankruptcies are caused by soaring medical bills

Yikes. Socialized medicine doesn't look so bad. At least you don't end up a pauper because you got sick.

121 posted on 12/28/2005 7:40:43 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
Socialized medicine doesn't look so bad. At least you don't end up a pauper because you got sick.

We often hear about Americans' saving rate being too low. I think Americans are making a rational decision - what's the point of saving if it all can be wiped out by a major disease.

122 posted on 12/28/2005 7:46:52 AM PST by Feldkurat_Katz (What no women’s magazine ever offers to improve is women’s minds - Taki)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
"Yikes. Socialized medicine doesn't look so bad. At least you don't end up a pauper because you got sick."

No, you end up dead because you had to wait too long for that needed life-saving medical procedure that has been rationed.

Nik
123 posted on 12/28/2005 7:48:04 AM PST by Nik Naym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish

You said: I ran a debt negotiation office for years. Your wrong. By saying "Considering that true emergencies occur very infrequently"

Most of theses peoples lives are emergencies...they were close to the edge as is and something bad happened....they just can't get off the mat. I have spent many nites crunching numbers with these folks trying to square a circle. I was amazed at the sacrifices they would try to make to keep themselves from filing BK.

I don't say I know all the answers but I usually left the office whispering...... there but by the grace of God go I.
***

Too many people live their lives so as to "create" these "emergencies." A catastrophic illness in the family is one thing, but far too many people refuse to live sufficiently within their means. They never put anything aside, because they bought too nice a car, too large a house and too many goodies of different kinds. The temptation is there for everyone, but it has to be resisted. We still live in the same house we bought in 1988. Our income has much more than doubled since that time, even with my wife working part time so that our kids are properly cared for. We took out a 15 year loan, refinanced once, and resisted the urge to "move up" as our incomes increased. We reasonably priced new cars when our old ones give up the ghost. We eat out occasionally, but even when we do, we don't go to the high-priced places. We give generously to our church and other charities (and while this helps at tax time, it is still a net reduction to our bottom line). While this is not the image most attorneys wish to convey, we are happy to be reasonably comfortable. It would take a lot for us to have to go back into debt, and it could happen, I suppose.

Live within your means. Pay the credit card off each month, and well before the due date, IF you have to use it. Save for what you want, then pay cash. Try not to want so much. It isn't as exciting as the lifestyles many lead, but it sure makes it easier to sleep at night.


124 posted on 12/28/2005 7:49:12 AM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym
No, you end up dead because you had to wait too long for that needed life-saving medical procedure that has been rationed. Nik

I've got relatives in Europe. While many times they have had to wait a long time to see a doctor, no one died.

I'm not putting up socialized medicine as the solution, but our own system is far from utopian.

125 posted on 12/28/2005 7:59:29 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Canaries in the coal mine. Don't think it hasn't been noticed by Wall Street.

Banks know exactly what their exposures are long before someone goes bankrupt. These are just small percentages of their business model.

Economically, this has very little impact as the bankrupt parties continue spending. After filing, their paychecks go much further as all those huindreds of dollars spent on monthly credit card minimum payments can now go to what ever they desire to purchase. They quickly become cash paying customers. Many can get more credit cards quickly from credit card issuers who specialize in loaning to bankrupt consumers.

What's in your wallet?

126 posted on 12/28/2005 8:01:31 AM PST by AmusedBystander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; Jhoffa_; FITZ; arete; FreedomPoster; Red Jones; ...
[Nik Naym:] No, you end up dead because you had to wait too long for that needed life-saving medical procedure that has been rationed.

This is the old Hush Bimbo spiel. Look at the REAL outcome - the life expectancy ranking:

6 Japan 81.15
7 Sweden 80.40
12 Canada 80.10
16 France 79.60
21 Israel 79.32
25 Greece 79.09
43 Jordan 78.24
48 United States 77.71
54 Albania 77.24

And guess who spends the most money?

127 posted on 12/28/2005 8:04:31 AM PST by A. Pole (John Kenneth Galbraight: "Why should life be made intolerable to make things of small urgency?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

"That greenish Japanese mustard"

It's called "wasabi."

First time I had it, I thought it was guacamole and just slathered it on. Guess what happened next :)


128 posted on 12/28/2005 8:11:38 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (MORE COWBELL! MORE COWBELL! (CLANK-CLANK-CLANK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Those life expectancy figures are nothing more than idiotic statistics that are trotted out every time someone wants to make the case that the U.S. health care system is somehow dysfunctional and needs to be made into a socialist system like those in other industrialized nations.

Among industrialized nations, variations in health care systems have very little influence on overall life expectancy statistics. The U.S. ranks so low on this list for two reasons, neither of which has anything to do with the type of health care system we have. For one thing, the U.S. has more people living in remote, sparsely-populated areas than countries in Europe and advanced industrialized countries in Asia. This means Americans are more susceptible to death due to a lack of immediate emergency medical care in cases of motor vehicle accidents, medical emergencies, etc.

The second -- and more important -- factor is our culture of individual freedom combined with our diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. Most of the countries that rank high for life expectancy are very homogenized populations living in regimented cultures. The U.S. has a higher incidence of almost any social pathology (drug abuse, alcoholism, violent crime, etc.) than most countries, which goes a long way toward explaining why our life expectancy is lower than most other modern, industrial countries. In fact, I believe terms like "crack baby" can't even be translated into Japanese.

One last thing to consider is that a country's average life expectancy could be influenced by health care factors that are misleading indicators of the nation's health care system. Jordan, for example, has an average life expectancy that is slightly higher than that of the U.S. And yet I would venture to guess that 99% of the people who have the option of getting medical treatment in either country would -- and do -- select the U.S. Jordan's average life expectancy is influenced by people like the late King Hussein, who traveled to the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota on numerous occasions for his medical treatment. For life expectancy statistics to have any meaning in the context of a country's medical care, people like this should be counted in the country where they get their medical treatment (particularly for serious illness or injury), not where they live.

129 posted on 12/28/2005 8:30:18 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Said the night wind to the little lamb . . . "Do you see what I see?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The second -- and more important -- factor is our culture of individual freedom combined with our diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds.

One example I gave - France is quite diverse too :(

And still it does not justify being in between Jordan and Albania!!! Not when you count how much money is being spent.

130 posted on 12/28/2005 8:37:49 AM PST by A. Pole (John Kenneth Galbraight: "Why should life be made intolerable to make things of small urgency?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

There is more to medical care than the life expectancy. Take, for example, dermatology. Does it contribute to life expectancy?


131 posted on 12/28/2005 8:43:44 AM PST by Feldkurat_Katz (What no women’s magazine ever offers to improve is women’s minds - Taki)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
France has very little violent crime, though. Those recent riots are a classic case in point. Several weeks of malcontents running around the suburbs of Paris, unfettered by any sense of law and order . . . and as far as I know there was only a single fatality attributed to the riots.

That kind of lawless environment in almost any city in the U.S. would result in dozens of deaths and hundreds of injuries.

132 posted on 12/28/2005 8:44:11 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Said the night wind to the little lamb . . . "Do you see what I see?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob

THATS cuz they are iowa. Who the hell would live there on purpose.


133 posted on 12/28/2005 8:46:59 AM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Feldkurat_Katz
There is more to medical care than the life expectancy. Take, for example, dermatology. Does it contribute to life expectancy?

Why not? For example long lasting skin infections, allergies etc ..., could have an impact.

134 posted on 12/28/2005 8:51:21 AM PST by A. Pole (John Kenneth Galbraight: "Why should life be made intolerable to make things of small urgency?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
There is more to medical care than the life expectancy. Take, for example, dermatology. Does it contribute to life expectancy?

Why not? For example long lasting skin infections, allergies etc ..., could have an impact.

I thought my acne could not kill me. How wrong was I.

135 posted on 12/28/2005 9:01:05 AM PST by Feldkurat_Katz (What no women’s magazine ever offers to improve is women’s minds - Taki)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather

"THATS cuz they are iowa. Who the hell would live there on purpose."

Why does the wind always blow south in Minnesota, north in Missouri, east in Nebraska, southeast in South Dakota, southwest in Wisconsin, and northwest in Illinois?

Because Iowa sucks... :)


136 posted on 12/28/2005 9:01:18 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (MORE COWBELL! MORE COWBELL! (CLANK-CLANK-CLANK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

Comment #137 Removed by Moderator

To: A. Pole
Why not? For example long lasting skin infections, allergies etc ..., could have an impact.

Not to mention skin cancer.

138 posted on 12/28/2005 9:13:26 AM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll

How do credit card companies "promote feminism" and "promote gay lifestyle kit(s)ch spending," exactly? I've never seen that commercial.


139 posted on 12/28/2005 9:13:38 AM PST by Xenalyte (Babies, before we're done here, y'all be wearin' gold-plated diapers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #140 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-255 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson