The article doesn't claim that superluminal communication (in the sense of relativity-violating information transfer) is taking place.
In as much, as "already" is a meaningful-term QT-wise, the information is "already" at the other place. Or rather, "was" at. Was and is, that is. Or was. So be it.
Right, I should have responded to post 19, which initially mentioned faster than light, not yours.