To: ndt
The war is not over. Nothing's permanent. ID is much more scientific (if that means factual, actual, true) than Darwin's atheistic (and illogical) musings. We must continue to flail at the wall. With the 6th Court ruling, there is a crack in it--howbeit, tiny--nevertheless, a precious tiny crack. PRECEDENCE has been set. Future cases CAN (oh I pray WILL) widen the crack. Here's a pitch for the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF): doing a great job helping to break down the wall. I contribute to it regularly.
To: dimmer-rats stealvotes
"We must continue to flail at the wall."
Option B is to actually understand the law and the reasoning behind it and try to get something done, but if flailing is all you want to do, then flail away my friend.
"With the 6th Court ruling, there is a crack in it--howbeit, tiny--nevertheless, a precious tiny crack."
It is not a crack. The 6th relied on the Lemon Test from Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), they have no option but to adhere to it because it came from a superior court. The 6th has no power to overturn a Supreme Court decision.
"PRECEDENCE has been set." Yes it has, by Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
The only thing that will remove the Lemon Test is if it is overturned by SCOTUS or a constitutional amendment is passed.
21 posted on
12/29/2005 6:57:43 PM PST by
ndt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson