Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Brokeback' a Box Office Success So Far
AP in Yahoo News ^ | December 29, 2005 | Sandy Cohen

Posted on 12/29/2005 6:11:43 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia

LOS ANGELES - Who's afraid of a couple of gay cowboys? Not moviegoers, who helped "Brokeback Mountain" post the highest per-screen average over the film-flush holiday weekend.

The Ang Lee film, which follows the 20-year forbidden romance between two roughneck ranch hands, earned $13,599 per theater, compared with $9,305 for weekend winner "King Kong" and $8,225 for "The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe."

The big question is whether "Brokeback" can maintain its momentum as it moves from selected cities, where audiences are receptive to the subject matter, to suburbs far and wide, where that might not be the case.

Early numbers — and early awards buzz — establish the picture's staying power, industry insiders say. "Brokeback" earned a leading seven Golden Globe nominations.

"It delivered very strong growth in what is truly a highly unforgiving, competitive, cruel market at this Christmas period," said Jack Foley, president of theatrical distribution for Focus Features. "It showed it has breadth beyond the gay community."

Distributors planned to roll out the film slowly. It opened in just six theaters, where it earned an "unprecedented" $109,000 per venue, said Paul Dergarabedian, president of box office tracker Exhibitor Relations Co. Inc.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: boxoffice; hollyweird; homosexualagenda; pudding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-178 next last
To: SAMS

Right, popcorn with extra butter. Yuck


81 posted on 12/29/2005 7:05:01 AM PST by DariusBane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: manic4organic
That was actually the title of the cover story about the film in The Village Voice.

Though it might not have been pluralized.

I'm amazed at how hard the media is straining to make this bomb seem appealing.

You would assume that even the most cloistered left-wing zombie would start to catch the drift after a while.

I guess not.

82 posted on 12/29/2005 7:05:59 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

The film and its attendant media-spin is a big joke. As a matter of fact....

2 queer sheep herders walk into a tent...


83 posted on 12/29/2005 7:07:54 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Dagnabit! I dint set my beeber to stune. How will I stop the the chimpeachment now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Spin, spin, spin those numbers

If you can't pound the facts, pound the table.

84 posted on 12/29/2005 7:08:22 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
The big question is whether "Brokeback" can maintain its momentum as it moves from selected cities, where audiences are receptive to the subject matter,
85 posted on 12/29/2005 7:09:23 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey hey ho ho Andy Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Eventually, they will reduce the stats to "The avg salary of movie watcher for this movie was...".

What a pathetic attempt to shine a turd.


86 posted on 12/29/2005 7:09:25 AM PST by smith288 (Peace at all cost makes for tyranny free of charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaylar

The $14 million cost for making BrokeHump does not include marketing and advertising costs. I would expect they're not spending a ton, even those ads have been running in NYC.


87 posted on 12/29/2005 7:09:59 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
How to Lie With Statistics
88 posted on 12/29/2005 7:10:02 AM PST by torchthemummy ("Reid...Kerry...Rockefeller. They were unable to attend due to a prior lack of commitment." - Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
If you can't pound the facts, pound the table.

If you cant pound the table... Nah...wont go there.

89 posted on 12/29/2005 7:10:57 AM PST by smith288 (Peace at all cost makes for tyranny free of charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

"Brokedick Mountain", There, correct movie title.


90 posted on 12/29/2005 7:12:33 AM PST by Issaquahking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
ROTF. Now we know where Baghdad Bob landed....

Absolutely ROFLMAO!!!!!!

Thanks for making my day!

homosexual cowboys..........ew! So now the homosexuals want to take away cowboy heros....double puke!

91 posted on 12/29/2005 7:12:44 AM PST by Republic (I have AMAZING confidence in and TRUST in our PRESIDENT! I LOVE HIM and his ENTIRE TEAM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
It's possible that the film will at least gross the cost to film and distribute, perhaps even possible to eventually break even (especially once released to DVD). But of course, this is only because some of the folks associated with this film (including the award-winning director) forewent much of the compensation that they usually would have received for their participation. Otherwise, this film would have easily cost double or triple what it actually did.

It will probably make money. But that is only because the actors and directors took a huge cut in pay to make this movie and the movie enjoyed millions of dollars of free hype by the liberal critics and the MSM. If Bareback had paid normal salaries and had to pay for its publicity, it would have lost money bigtime. But this wasn't about making money of course, but advancing negative stereotypes of conservatives while trying to put the best possible face on liberalism.

92 posted on 12/29/2005 7:14:45 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory; peyton randolph
All the signs indicate the movie's going to do very well for a small independent film, make its producers some money, and not be seen by the large majority of Americans.

In one sense I agree - put aside all the adoring MSM hoopla and what you've got is a glorified arthouse flick.

But that's the good news. As several here have pointed out, it's box office take is nowhere near to covering production costs and already they are getting close to being out of reliable markets. And promotional costs must have been substantial, just considering the TV ad buys - it would not surprise me to find those costs exceeded production costs.

As peyton randolph says, gays may prop it up through January with repeat viewings but the demographics are such that it won't be enough.

All in all, it's a small financial gamble by Hollywood standards, well worth the political and Oscar points they think they are scoring. That's what this flick is about.

93 posted on 12/29/2005 7:17:50 AM PST by Heatseeker (Never underestimate the left's tendency to underestimate us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I love how they use the per-screen number to inflate the success of this movie. LOVE.

6 theaters with a highly-targeted (and VERY affluent audience) == Widely-distributed Family Film?

Hey Hollywood, keep it up!
(I'd love to see you become COMPLETELY irrelevant next year!)

94 posted on 12/29/2005 7:20:49 AM PST by detsaoT (run bsd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus

Well since we can't seem to let this movie go since we discuss it everyday. The worst thing about this movie is that they fu** around when they are married. You know it is bad enough that it is a gay film, but they just had to add adultury which was not necessary. It looks like a stupid boring film anyway. I can't even imagine why the gays would want to see this anyway.


95 posted on 12/29/2005 7:20:53 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

comparing apples to road-apples...


96 posted on 12/29/2005 7:21:28 AM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961; Regicide; Mr. K; dfwgator; Alberta's Child; A. Pole

Giant Commie Robot sez:

YOU CAPITALIST, BOURGEOISIE FILTH! How little you see, plutocratic, homophobic scum. "Brokeback Mountain" is the height of aesthetic realism, and gay, robotic, Soviet artistic expression. You shall lap up our tendentious propaganda about gay sheep-rustlers eating the pudding of the proletariat, or YOU SHALL BE CRUSHED BY THE ONCOMING ONSLAUGHT OF THE WORKER-LABORER STATE! Fascist-capitalists who despise the heightened consciousness aroused by the brilliant, politically correct oeuvre of Kushner and Larry Kramer will have no place in our classless utopia. *buzz* *clank* *sssssst* DEVIATIONISTS MUST BE CRUSHED!!! *plonk*

97 posted on 12/29/2005 7:22:44 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
NOT WORK SAFE: Brokeback Mountain Parody
98 posted on 12/29/2005 7:23:31 AM PST by WolfRunnerWoman (Communism isn't dead, it's just regrouping)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan
There's a reason they're rolling this movie out so slowly...

Yes, they're just easing it in...

99 posted on 12/29/2005 7:24:16 AM PST by RightFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
>Now we know where Baghdad Bob landed....

Right here at FR!
Can you remember a film
getting daily threads

every day this long?
Freepers are plugging this film
with the same passion

of Lord Of The Rings!
Any publicity is
good publicity!

So many Freepers
talking about this movie
will make it millions!

100 posted on 12/29/2005 7:28:10 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson