Posted on 12/29/2005 6:11:43 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
I wonder how many times the "popcorn trick" from Diner is going to happen in those theaters?
Don't like the outcome? Change the rules!
They'll get a good turn-out from the highway, rest-stop crowd.
Right. It's sort of like saying that Rolls Royce makes more money per vehicle produced than Toyota does -- and yet nobody considers Rolls Royce a giant in the auto industry.
It's a financial flop. $14 million to make. $4 million in revenue. $10 million in the hole and the hype is wearing off in the homo markets. Look at the per screen averages.
How is it going to make another $10 million dollars to break even? They're out of homo markets.
Domestic Total as of Dec. 26, 2005: $7,573,000 (Estimate)
Running Time: 2 hrs. 14 min.
Production Budget: $14 million
that doesnt include marketing and * gifts *
Brokebutt, I can't wait to not see it.
What is it with people who think that when normal people are repulsed by the gay life style that they are afraid of it?
It's kind of silly to call a movie a flop a few weeks after its opening when they're still planning to expand it to more theaters. It's like calling a basketball game exceptionally low-scoring after 4 minutes.
All the signs indicate the movie's going to do very well for a small independent film, make its producers some money, and not be seen by the large majority of Americans.
And we're talking millions and millions of free publicity; through the Globe nominations, the evening news spots, the newspaper articles, etc. The MSM is going to the mat with this and maybe theyll make a few bucks on it. More hype than anything else.
BBM has already played to it's demographic and has nowhere else to go. In the end (a year down the road) the producers may make a couple of million bucks.
Assuming it was a year in the making, and 2 years before the full returns are realized, not a great return on $14M dollars, but I suppose a person could do worse.
"Flaming Queers on Blazing Saddles"
If my memory serves me, "limited market roll-outs" are generally subject to "special" (read: higher) pricing per ticket.
The rules are that the makers of the movies need $28 million dollars in box office revenue in order to break even. The box office gross is only around $8 million. Their liberal math skills can't disguise the fact that they're $20 million short of break-even.
"The hack flacking for this film is unreal! Every other box office tally lists the amount of million$ the film grossed over the period. In order to inflate this one, they have to use the "per-screen average." Pure propaganda."
I agree. I have never heard of a movie being evaluated on its "per screen average." There is obviously an agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.