Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Badray

Actually, it was the other way around. Challenges to warrantless searches, for instance, those searches incident to arrest, were virtually unheard of until the early 20th century.

In any event, your reply was very reasoned, and thoughtful and provided food for thought.

255 posted on 01/26/2006 5:05:05 AM PST by Boot Hill ("...and Joshua went unto him and said: art thou for us, or for our adversaries?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: Boot Hill

I'm not sure that we are disagreeing here.

(I only got 3 hours of sleep and each hour was interupted at least 2 times and I'm still groggy.)

Can you point me to a good place to research this. Even though I am sleep challenged, I am time challenged as well. I wear too many hats.

I believe that there were plenty of abuses and for a long time, we sided with the police too readily and almost blindly. If the police said that someone was guilty, we believed it. There was no reason to question them.

I am happy to hear that you found my argument to be worthy of further consideration. Thanks for any help that you can point me to.


256 posted on 01/26/2006 12:06:22 PM PST by Badray (In the hands of bureaucrat, a clip board is as deadly as a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson