Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
the contents of Jabara's communications to violate Jabara's fourth amendment rights.

There has been no offical confirmation anyhere that NSA was listening to the contents of anyone's communications in this particular operation.

I am of the opinion - nothing more - that they were capturing the connections between known and (previously) unknown individuals for the purpose of building a network diagram of al Qaeda operators and sympathizers, whether internationally or here in the US.

Also that FISA warrants were subsequently requested against individuals found to have any communication patterns of note.

This approach would be permissable under Jabara.

56 posted on 01/03/2006 6:02:29 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: angkor
There has been no offical confirmation anyhere that NSA was listening to the contents of anyone's communications in this particular operation.

I am of the opinion - nothing more - that they were capturing the connections between known and (previously) unknown individuals for the purpose of building a network diagram of al Qaeda operators and sympathizers, whether internationally or here in the US.

You might be right, but that would be a darn weak protective/preventive measure.

As others have said, the only ralistic approach to communications is to assume that 100% of the contents can be and is intercepted - act accordingly and you'll be fine.

59 posted on 01/03/2006 6:10:34 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson