Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: new yorker 77
Wow, who'd a' seen this one coming?
2 posted on
01/06/2006 2:25:01 PM PST by
pcottraux
(It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
To: new yorker 77
3 posted on
01/06/2006 2:25:07 PM PST by
highball
("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
To: new yorker 77
Bring it on, you dirtbags!
To: new yorker 77
"No one expects The Inquisition!"
5 posted on
01/06/2006 2:26:46 PM PST by
keithtoo
(Global Warming causes everything, and everything causes Global Warming.)
To: prairiebreeze; Mo1
I know we're not surprised at this...
6 posted on
01/06/2006 2:27:51 PM PST by
Peach
To: new yorker 77
Of course they are and they have no chance
He's in
8 posted on
01/06/2006 2:28:07 PM PST by
Vision
(“We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the duty of intelligent men")
To: new yorker 77
Who has the picture of Captain Obvious?
To: new yorker 77
It will bounce back on them if they do
11 posted on
01/06/2006 2:28:44 PM PST by
Kaslin
(The terrorists must be allowed to attack us again.... Sincerly A leftwinger)
To: new yorker 77
12 posted on
01/06/2006 2:28:50 PM PST by
Soul Seeker
(Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
To: new yorker 77
And in the process, that "TAKE DOWN THEMSELVES". Demomorans.
13 posted on
01/06/2006 2:29:13 PM PST by
Pit1
To: new yorker 77
15 posted on
01/06/2006 2:29:36 PM PST by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: All; Clintonfatigued; AliVeritas
16 posted on
01/06/2006 2:30:12 PM PST by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: new yorker 77
This sounds semi-retarded. The only problem as with so many Clinton plans is they only need to stand up for 72 hours during the hearings. This could be a ploy to get GOP'ers to delay the hearings longer to uncover this vast plot. Hopefully it will be as effective as 60 minutes Docugate.
To: new yorker 77
Their paymasters ponied up huge bucks to defeat Republican nominees and almost none of it got spent trying to defeat Roberts. If they don't put forth an effort on Alito, the money river might dry up.
21 posted on
01/06/2006 2:31:07 PM PST by
John Jorsett
(scam never sleeps)
To: new yorker 77
I just wonder which Rs will cave in....again
24 posted on
01/06/2006 2:32:08 PM PST by
rrrod
To: new yorker 77
"Alito is Dangerous...He must be Destroyed!"
26 posted on
01/06/2006 2:32:33 PM PST by
woofie
To: new yorker 77
It must be Friday aftenoon or something, with Matt creating hype for his Sunday radio show.
28 posted on
01/06/2006 2:33:33 PM PST by
Real Cynic No More
(iLiberals and MSM manipulate the news.)
To: new yorker 77
What can I say, I'm stunned!!!!!!! LOL!
31 posted on
01/06/2006 2:37:00 PM PST by
Halls
(Dallas County, Texas, but my heart is in East Texas!)
To: new yorker 77
Senate Democrats have put into place a plan that includes one last push to take down the nomination of Judge Samuel A. Alito I don't worry the Uber-Cons that told us we needed this argument will save Alito.
To: new yorker 77
You can't destroy anyone unless you've got some dirt on him, or can invent some believable dirt. Since I seriously doubt they've got anything on him, and the things they've made up so far aren't sticking, it will be interesting to see what they come up with next.
34 posted on
01/06/2006 2:37:20 PM PST by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
