Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Samuel Alito ~ Senate Judiciary Hearing [LIVE THREAD] (Day-3)
Senate Judiciary ^ | 1-11-06 | Senate Judiciary

Posted on 01/11/2006 5:01:17 AM PST by OXENinFLA

Day 3: Questioning Continues

This morning, Round 1 concludes with Senators on the Judiciary Cmte. who did not question nominee Alito yesterday. During Round 2, questioning is limited to 20 minutes for each of the eight- een senators. Chairman Arlen Specter (R-PA) leads off, followed by the others, alternating by party in order of seniority.

WEDS., 9:30AM ET, C-SPAN


Live Links

C-span

Judiciary LIVE LINK

FEDNET

CapitolHearings.org


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitoakbar; alitohearings; alitorulz; babykilling; bidenisamoron; bush2rats0; clangingcymbals; demsareduds; emptybarrels; feingoldstinks; feinsteinreeks; judicialnominees; judiciary; kennedysucks; penumbra; scotus; senate; super; superduper; superduperduper; welldecided
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 3,801-3,808 next last
To: ken5050
Can anyone explain what is the impact/meaning of "findings"..I'm not a lawyer..never heard the term before..yet it was used a lot yesterday by Alito, saying that Congress should include "findings" with the laws it passed..Are those Cliff's Notes, or work papers...Does it mean that Congress is supposed to explain the laws it passes?

Alito was referring to the findings that Congress makes when passing a law. Congressional authority to pass a law must be found in the Constitution. The Commerce Clause is a major one.

Since U.S. v. Lopez, the SC has brought the Commerce Clause back down to earth to where it has some meaning. Congress must demonstrate that a law passed on this basis is actually related to interstate commerce as it has been interpreted by the court. I.E., the govt. must demonstrate that it has the authority to do what it is doing. In my view this is the essence of a limited federal govt.

The level of deference granted to such findings is up to each justice. Some, like Scalia, almost completely ignore the findings. Others just accept the findings when it suits the result they want.

781 posted on 01/11/2006 9:22:13 AM PST by Clump
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
...it looks like his head is going to explode...

Fingers crossed!

Question, Senator Kennedy, When did your commitment to the people of Mass. and America end?

782 posted on 01/11/2006 9:22:22 AM PST by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 768 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

TEDDY.......... GET THIS! IT IS TIME FOR YOU TO STHU


783 posted on 01/11/2006 9:22:22 AM PST by JFC (W, I am with YA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Go Hatch!

The old fat fart got rattled. God, I hope Alito is able to stay calm.


784 posted on 01/11/2006 9:22:23 AM PST by Jrabbit (Kaufman County, Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

lol I didn't hear that one!


785 posted on 01/11/2006 9:22:25 AM PST by Terriergal (Cursed be any love or unity for whose sake the Word of God must be put at stake. -- Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 763 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
I've always thought him to be an incredibly smart man always looking out for the helpless.

Whoa!! Where have YOU been?? Are you really talking about Sheets Byrd here??

786 posted on 01/11/2006 9:22:26 AM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Tubby is trying sooooo hard to impugn Alito's integrity.


787 posted on 01/11/2006 9:22:28 AM PST by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin

Good. Alito says "it refers to my initial term of service".

Memo to Kennedy: Maybe if you'd stick around for the hearings, you'd know this was already answered quite handily yesterday.


788 posted on 01/11/2006 9:22:29 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 772 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit
I've seen him (Hatch) go for the jugular. He's good.

He has riled me on occasion, but when he is good, he is very, very good, and he did a good job on this round.

His remark just now made to Kennedy that he could explain to him what he doesn't understand was hilarious. lol.

789 posted on 01/11/2006 9:22:31 AM PST by LucyJo ("I have overcome the world." "Abide in Me." (John 16:33; 15:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

He forgot where it is


790 posted on 01/11/2006 9:22:35 AM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

GMTA!


791 posted on 01/11/2006 9:22:48 AM PST by Terriergal (Cursed be any love or unity for whose sake the Word of God must be put at stake. -- Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Yes, and we're on that issue now. Wow, I really think Teddy's gonna have a seizure or freak out or something.


792 posted on 01/11/2006 9:23:10 AM PST by ilovew ("We are living through a watershed moment in the story of freedom." GWB 12-14-05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 761 | View Replies]

To: andrew2527

Hey Kennedy! Don't point that finger at me daddio....we don't know where it's been!


793 posted on 01/11/2006 9:23:12 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Hook'em Horns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
.it looks like his head is going to explode...

That's partially the alcohol blush you're noticing.

794 posted on 01/11/2006 9:23:17 AM PST by Terriergal (Cursed be any love or unity for whose sake the Word of God must be put at stake. -- Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 768 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
What is this time limit thing he's hashing on?

What's the time limit on being responsible for someone's death?

795 posted on 01/11/2006 9:23:19 AM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

Kennedy is going for "proof" of the dems' charge that Alito isn't answering the questions. Kennedy is beneath contempt. This valueLESS creep isn't fit to shine Alito's shoes.


796 posted on 01/11/2006 9:23:22 AM PST by Carolinamom (If you pursue happiness, you'll never find it. ---C.P. Snow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
The Dems are not only being discourteous--they are violating TITLE SEVEN of the Civil Rights Act by using religion as a basis for a person qualifying for a job in the Federal Sector. Being confirmed to be Attorney General or a member of SCOTUS is in essence applying for a job in the Federal government. Sugesting a person could be denied a position on the basis of their religious beliefs is DISCRMINATION!!

Maybe this is so obvious it has not been used to smack the Dems with. It needs to be!

797 posted on 01/11/2006 9:23:27 AM PST by milagro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 721 | View Replies]

To: daybreakcoming
I would love to see how Chaffee defends that vote, especially in a primary race against an extremely popular, conservative Republican.
798 posted on 01/11/2006 9:23:27 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 759 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

Kennedy gets Judge Alito confused with former SF Mayor Alioto.


799 posted on 01/11/2006 9:23:35 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: conservativebabe
Tubby is trying sooooo hard to impugn Alito's integrity.

Yes and he's sounding like an idiot

800 posted on 01/11/2006 9:23:38 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 787 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 3,801-3,808 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson