[craig_eddy]

I have a question, just in general:

If the left always claims that the Constitution is "a living document," why are they so worried that a judge may vote to overturn a previous ruling?

Is it a living document or not?

[pollyannaish]

Excellent point. It's only living when they are in charge, and only the parts that they want.

[King David]

Too logical a question.

[syriacus]

If the left always claims that the Constitution is "a living document," why are they so worried that a judge may vote to overturn a previous ruling?

Excellent question.

[Christian4Bush]

I have a question, just in general:

If the left always claims that the Constitution is "a living document," why are they so worried that a judge may vote to overturn a previous ruling?

Is it a living document or not?

---

EXCELLENT QUESTION!

[dinoparty]

If the left always claims that the Constitution is "a living document," why are they so worried that a judge may vote to overturn a previous ruling?
_________________________________________

The more clever lefties would say it doesn't just "live", it "progresses"...thus the ridiculous phrase "turning back the clock on rights". A movement toward constutionalism would, in their eyes, be regression, not progressive "life".
Of course, there is no basis for their claim.