Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strykers Refurbished After Iraq
StrategyPage ^ | January 11, 2006

Posted on 01/11/2006 12:13:44 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4

January 11, 2006: The U.S. Army’s new Stryker wheeled armored vehicle has been in Iraq for over two years now. The first Stryker brigade left its 299 Stryker vehicles in Iraq, when the troops finished their one year tour. Now, after two years, those vehicles are being brought home and refurbished. Seven percent of the vehicles got banged up pretty bad, mostly by roadside bombs. These had to be rebuilt.

Those 299 Strkyers averaged about 24,000 kilometers a year. Some put in close to 110,000 kilometers. Military wheeled vehicles operating in that part of the world are in need of refurbishment after about 50,000 kilometers. The refurbishment for the Strykers involves a new set of tires, new drive train and transmission. Any other equipment that got banged up or worn out will be repaired or replaced. Vehicles are repainted as needed. The electronics in each vehicle will be upgraded. The Strykers are the first of a new generation of “digital” vehicles. That means networking, computers and the ability to exchange digital data with other vehicles and troops equipped with wireless networking gear. In effect, a battlefield Internet. This stuff survived remarkably well in Iraq, despite the heat, dust, vibration and heavy use by the troops. The entire refurbishment process takes about twenty days per vehicle.

This was the first combat experience for the Strykers, and they performed quite well. Like most new military vehicles, they received a lot of criticism for being too expensive, too fragile, too heavy, too big and unsuited to the task. But the troops who used the Strykers liked them, and the vehicles proved to be more effective than any alternatives (more heavily armored M-2 Bradley’s, or armored hummers.)


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Germany; US: Alabama; US: Alaska; US: Hawaii; US: Louisiana; US: Pennsylvania; US: Washington; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: sbct; stryker; wheeledarmor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: R. Scott

That is untrue. You will have to talk to the recently releasd soldiers who were attached to this lash-up.


21 posted on 01/15/2006 9:40:26 PM PST by Vetvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vetvoice

I have. There will always be a few who demand nothing but perfection – in everything but themselves. I did meet one disgruntled soldier who complained that a friend had been killed when Stryker was hit with an “IED”. The Sargent I was talking to at the time added that the "IED" was five 500 pound bombs wired together.


22 posted on 01/16/2006 3:33:05 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Vetvoice; Cannoneer No. 4
"Damn you people are gullible. Talk to some soldiers that are now OUT of the Stryker Brigades. They tell an entirely different tale than the one General Dynamics ginned up."

Vetvoice - Some points:
I have no idea why you are directing this comment to me. And my "gullibility days are long passed.
I do have contact with both active duty military, contractors and OEM personnel on a somewhat daily basis. What this has always told me is that everybody has their own "truths" in what they say. I don't have a damn thing to do with Strykers, so I simply don't friggin' know from beans about them other than what I hear and read. Which gives me exactly squat worth of opinion.
IMO, Cannoneer No.4 has always performed an exemplary job of providing accurate and multi-sided info. He has also made it clear when he is/was presenting a personal opinion on issues. If you have a problem/bitch/complaint or difference of opinion with something he posts, be prepared to back it up with valid sources and references - not scuttle butt or barracks BS. We all know what that is worth. And if so, discuss it with him via back-channels.

I have found that there are a lot of "experts" on here and a few who have the real skinny. And they ain't necessarily the same folks all the time.

23 posted on 01/16/2006 5:07:12 PM PST by Khurkris ("Hell, I was there"...Elmer Keith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Vetvoice
"Dear Lonnie,

Thank you for sharing that with me. I will give it due consideration.

Hope you get to feeling better.

Cannoneer No. 4

24 posted on 01/16/2006 5:25:53 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Move fast, shoot straight, and let the counselors sort it out ten years from now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: plustaticman
Post 19 may interest you.
25 posted on 02/03/2006 5:57:17 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Most of the guys who I went to war with, those who stayed in, wanted to stay Stryker. Even the guys who grew up on Bradleys and Tanks.


26 posted on 02/04/2006 12:02:08 AM PST by plustaticman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Sorry, but I don't recall the exchange.


27 posted on 03/14/2006 2:47:33 AM PST by Vetvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris

There are not many whose "truths" have been fact-checked and published by daily newspaers. I've published seven articles.


28 posted on 03/14/2006 2:49:47 AM PST by Vetvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vetvoice
I wish you continued success in all of your endeavours.
29 posted on 03/14/2006 3:15:18 AM PST by Khurkris ("Hell, I was there"...Elmer Keith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
You need to stay current with the current push by General Dynamics to keep 41 soldiers from maintaining each Stryker Brigade. You see, General Dynamics charges us $250,000 per year for each technician they send oversees with the Strykers. They do not want to lose that revenue.
30 posted on 09/08/2006 11:41:21 PM PDT by Vetvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Vetvoice

War profiteer huh?


31 posted on 09/08/2006 11:54:23 PM PDT by endthematrix (None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Vetvoice

Not exactly news, and not limited to General Dynamics. Civilian tech reps have long been used to maintain equipment, even way back before I retired over 20 years ago. They were even used at the depot level during the Viet Nam War.


32 posted on 09/09/2006 2:21:16 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
When the General Dynamic technicians arrived in country (Iraq), their cost to the US was $250,000 each per year plus their convoy of supplies and parts that had to be purchased at list prices each time a Stryker had a flat or flaked out.

Now General Dynamics has a better deal. They are now the ONLY organization that can touch a Stryker to repair it. Presumably they will not charge us $250,000 per man in American military depots but there is no guarantee.
33 posted on 12/23/2006 11:05:11 PM PST by Vetvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

My only objection to the Stryker was always the corruption used by Generals Heebner, Keane and Shinseki to pull off the deal. They will not even allow us to breathe now that our military is shot through and through with wheeled armor. They need to, at least, 'fess up to the Americans how many tracked vehicles the Soviets lost is Afghanistan (1250) before they withdrew them and brought in all tracks.


34 posted on 12/23/2006 11:10:08 PM PST by Vetvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Vetvoice

Civilian tech reps are the only ones allowed to work on the Stryker - even at the organization level?


35 posted on 12/24/2006 3:34:59 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Name one system during Vietnam that required civilian technicians.


36 posted on 03/24/2007 7:01:41 PM PDT by Vetvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris

I back mine with three years in the Army, 18 months in Vietnam and eight years in college - four for a Bachelors, two for a Masters amd two more for my PhD. That and a lifetime of contacts with all military from servicing soldiers to reserves and contractors keep me pretty well on top of things...


37 posted on 03/24/2007 7:08:51 PM PDT by Vetvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vetvoice

At the depot level it was common for helicopters (onboard the Corpus Christi Bay) - and even for boats. We seldom had the available time to use depot level, we did everything from engine rebuilds to hull repair ourselves until we started working with the Navy. They may have had civilians, but when my boat was in dry dock I was in the hospital.


38 posted on 03/24/2007 7:17:23 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson