Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass. exodus
The Boston Globe ^ | January 15, 2006 | Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 01/15/2006 10:56:28 AM PST by george76

Edited on 01/15/2006 11:16:36 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

FOR THE second year in a row...the population of Massachusetts has shrunk.

It was one of only three states to end the year with fewer people than it had at the start -- New York and Rhode Island were the others -- and the only one to do so for the second year running.


(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Maine; US: Massachusetts; US: New Hampshire; US: New York; US: Rhode Island; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitohearings; barneyfrank; bigdig; boylolipop; census; demoralizing; dukakis; exodus; fatted; frank; g76; harvard; homosexualagenda; illegalaliens; jacoby; kennedy; kerry; lurch; massachusetts; migration; oppressive; oppressivepolitical; owlclub; politicalculture; population; romneysucks; samesexmarriage; scotus; shrunk; supremecourt; tedkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-231 next last
To: Jackson57

I understand. I'm glad you see where I am coming from, and I understand that not everybody who comes down here is looking to do that.


101 posted on 01/15/2006 12:22:00 PM PST by SC33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: george76

ABSOLUTELY!! Very well stated.


102 posted on 01/15/2006 12:22:19 PM PST by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Wow. This is part of why Boston is literally collapsing as we speak.


103 posted on 01/15/2006 12:22:40 PM PST by ROTB (Our Constitution ... only for a moral and religious people... -- John Adams, October 11, 1798)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets

"This is a state in which a tax cut can be decisively approved by the voters yet never go into effect."

"In which a $2 billion Big Dig ends up costing $14 billion."

"In which Ted Kennedy keeps getting reelected."


104 posted on 01/15/2006 12:22:41 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: minus_273

Corruption is rampamt.

After my recent trip to the South, I'd say that taxes are not so bad here, at least in restaurants and such places.


105 posted on 01/15/2006 12:24:16 PM PST by Radix (Welcome home 3 ID!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

The good people are fleeing the communism, faggotry, high cost,(due to communism) and the loss of the second amendment.(Romney)

How long before they build the new berlin wall to keep the small business and property owners in the state?


106 posted on 01/15/2006 12:26:51 PM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Nobody will be asked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris1

"NY gave GWB more votes than most of the red states combined, don't forget it!"

Same for California.

I guess every conservative vote in a blue state is wasted.

If we move we take our vote, our house of representatives' seat, and our electoral college votes with us.

So if we all move out of California and New York, what will Texas, Florida and Arizona be like, with about 30 or 40 million people each?

(my future may be in St. George, Utah. Or in Prescott, Arizona.)


107 posted on 01/15/2006 12:27:26 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Jackson57

I'm in my late 20s and the people I know who have left are in their late 20s through mid 30s. The difference in our perspectives probably reflects the limited segment of the population I know; of course I'm going to see more people my age and not be aware of people who are older.


108 posted on 01/15/2006 12:28:03 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Free Dominoes

Thanks for the correction. You are correct.

One vote for each senator.

But Mass could still lose a congressional seat soon.


109 posted on 01/15/2006 12:28:42 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

I would hate to work in Harvard Square. It is a panhandler/angsty suburban brat mecca and you have to deal with tons of tourists and students crowding the sidewalk.


110 posted on 01/15/2006 12:29:04 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ROTB

Boston's not collapsing. It's doing very well, and they're putting up tons of housing. The problem is that middle class families are leaving, and being replaced by a) immigrants and b) empty nesters, 20-something Carrie Bradshaw wannabes, and DINKs (often homosexuals). That's actually a great combination for the city's tax base and for companies looking for workers, but it means the population declines without a change in housing occupancy and you lose the sense of being a real city and not a playground for the rich.


111 posted on 01/15/2006 12:32:13 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Radix
Corruption is rampamt.

It's amazing how many people vote 'RAT because they think government's main purpose is to get their nephews and in-laws good jobs in the Department of Public Works or the Parking Office.
112 posted on 01/15/2006 12:35:09 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV

No, I didn't say there was a plan to infest other areas. I merely said "For all we know...". The point of the sentence was that there is no evidence in the article that anyone is leaving because of Massachussetts' liberal policies.


113 posted on 01/15/2006 12:36:10 PM PST by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: george76

It is a sure thing that MA will lose a seat after the 2010 census. Check out polidata.org


114 posted on 01/15/2006 12:38:27 PM PST by Free Dominoes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets

Tax-wise, Massachusetts is better off than in years past. I know people who moved to Pennsylvania and North Carolina who were shocked that personal property taxes (real estate) and/or income taxes were higher than Massachusetts. I have yet to discover why the populace in Massachusetts continues to vote against its interests by voting Democrat.
In my state legislative district, Cheryl Jacques resigned her state senate seat (after impregnating her "partner" with a turkey baster) to become the short-lived director of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay advocacy group. Her office manager, a basket case who never held an actual job, ran against a very competent Republican (Scott Brown) for the state senate seat. Brown won the interim election, and then prevailed again during the regular election cycle. But both elections were close, in the 51/49 percent range. With good voter turnout. I can only wonder why.
Real estate prices will moderate but not collapse as illegals occupy older urban properties while those who can, leave for the suburbs. Those with equity take the opportunity to cash out and move on to a more hospitable climate (in many senses of the word).
Jeff Jacoby used the word "disdain" for the elite's attitude toward the electorate. As one of those who is pulling the wagon (and getting fewer every day), I am waiting for the day I take off my harness and move on to a state where "disdain" is not the general attitude towards the populace.


115 posted on 01/15/2006 12:39:37 PM PST by Make It In Mass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
So you claim there is a plan to infest other areas? Hardly, since moving is a large expense and the very thought of a plan such as this being set up and implemented by the left, in secret, is out of the question.

Well there was a famous plan for liberals to move to Vermont that had articles published about it in many publications in the early 1970s. Vermont is now one of the bluest states. There are two active movements to get conservatives and libertarians to move to other states. One for Wyoming and one for New Hampshire. None of this is secret. No reason it should be, in fact that seems a little counter-productive if the goal is to get lots of like-thinking people to move. Publicity is your friend.

The porcupine is the symbol for the New Hampshire FSP. However they were considered to academic, centralized and East Coast biased by a group of Westerners. They have formed an alternate Wyoming based Free State movement.

Both aim to start with states that have a very conservative leaning political culture and enhance it via immigration from others states. The Wyoming movement has as one of its founders Boston T. Pary who wrote a novel about what an immaginary gradual electoral take over of Wyoming might look like. It's a fun book.

All images above are links back to the associated web site for anyone interested.

116 posted on 01/15/2006 12:40:20 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: All
This is a state In which Ted Kennedy keeps getting reelected.
117 posted on 01/15/2006 12:43:48 PM PST by Mogengator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
But I read right here on Free Republic that the economy is booming in Massachusetts. Jobs for everyone.

I know better. The state is hurting.

You certainly wouldn't know it from the voters. They seem to think there's plenty of room to tax and spend.

118 posted on 01/15/2006 12:46:56 PM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: old republic
For all we know the liberals could be moving out to corrupt other states with liberal colonies.

Some of that is true. Many liberals don't understand the connection between "liberalism" and "sucking". They believe the high prices and high crime are just incidental, not the result of regulations, gun control, etc. So they move to NC or somewhere and bring their dumb ideas with them.

119 posted on 01/15/2006 12:49:58 PM PST by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bkepley
You certainly wouldn't know it from the voters. They seem to think there's plenty of room to tax and spend. Well if you are retired, or a welfare recipient there is no reason not to keep taxing THOSE PEOPLE. It's more money for you. If your a government worker it probably makes sense too, more taxes from THEM means more money for YOU, so they vote Dem too. When the recepients are more than 50% of the populace there is really no incentive for them to not keep voting themselves benefits, until bankruptcy. I believe California is close to that than any other state, but I'm not really sure.
120 posted on 01/15/2006 12:52:09 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson