Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top Republican raises impeachment over surveillance flap
AFP via BREITBART ^ | January 15, 2006

Posted on 01/16/2006 5:03:36 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Kaslin

This is why I don't give to the NRSC. NOT ONE DIME!


41 posted on 01/16/2006 5:38:24 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

he's got enough experience at this game

He's old and sounded feable. I heard the full cut on the radio. Didn't see the program. Drudge played it last night.


42 posted on 01/16/2006 5:39:23 AM PST by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

DAMN RIGHT BUMP!! He should be defending President Bush because there is plenty of information out there that this was done in the past including the Clinton debacle. By the way, there are now linking the purchase of disposable phones to the NY Times NSA story. Treason is the only word for what the rag newspaper did.


43 posted on 01/16/2006 5:42:34 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Remember, Bush played a crucial role in making sure Specter survived a primary that was nearly won by a true conservative. This is what happens when you abandon principle for quid pro quo... the quo arrives as a dagger in your back.

Ain't that the truth. Bush is a dumbass, but not for the reasons the dems think.

44 posted on 01/16/2006 5:44:56 AM PST by stevio (Red-Blooded American Male (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mware
I too saw the exchange. I'd agree with you and say he was definitely set-up. Even though Specter is a Rino...We're believing the Media? Come on now.
45 posted on 01/16/2006 5:45:22 AM PST by colorcountry (Currently not in the process of becoming a God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGreek

I hate these guys who do everything they can to hold onto power to their dying breath, no matter the consequences. Imagine how much better a position the GOP would be in if Specter retired gracefully and Pat Toomey was sitting in his office, and some genuinely conservative GOPer was at the Judiciary chair.


46 posted on 01/16/2006 5:45:45 AM PST by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

he clearly could have forseen that he was being manipulated;

Agreed.


47 posted on 01/16/2006 5:48:55 AM PST by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

some genuinely conservative GOPer was at the Judiciary chair.

But your thoughts may be too hypothetical,
Would that person have won the general election in PA?
Would then the Junior Senator be on the Judiciary?
Certainly not a ranking member.
Specter has his faults, but he has assurred Roberts and now the Alito nominations.


48 posted on 01/16/2006 5:52:27 AM PST by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If Impeachment is a remedy so is congress passing laws to prevent the President from doing this sort of thing. Oh wait, if they passed a law then it would intrude on the Presidents Constitutional Obligations during war. Oh wait again, maybe that's what they want? While the congress is out passing laws, maybe they should pass a law against the use of caller IDs since it seems to be a violation of ones privacy.


49 posted on 01/16/2006 5:54:10 AM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Senate doesn't impeach the president anyway.


50 posted on 01/16/2006 5:55:42 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
"Misleading headline alert!"

Absolutely!
It should begin, "Hand-wringing, Power Hungry Weasel...."
51 posted on 01/16/2006 5:56:19 AM PST by yer gonna put yer eye out (To liberals, using large words is an acceptable substitute for logic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGreek; All

Does anyone have the transcript? If so, please post


52 posted on 01/16/2006 6:11:32 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGreek
All I have to see is AFP and I know enough to beware!

Yes. . .my only check was to come up with Reuters. . .and of course, Breitbart is a Dutch name and seems it has just been recently that it has 'popped' into media consciousness. . .

. . .or rather and at least; my 'media consciousness'. . .

53 posted on 01/16/2006 6:15:23 AM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

See my post #14


54 posted on 01/16/2006 6:15:53 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: HHFi
8:35 a.m. to the following day at 7:58 a.m. -- Jack sits in the waiting room, watching soaps, napping and reading issues of National Geographic and Highlights from 1986.

LOL!

55 posted on 01/16/2006 6:16:02 AM PST by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cricket; ConservativeGreek; All
Andrew Brietbart is a really good friend of Matt Drudge. He did most of the work for the Drudge report.

April 26, 2005: Andrew Breitbart Statement

I've gotten a ton of e-mails asking me what I'm up to. Here it is:

The New York Times got it right -- I am amicably leaving the Drudge Report after a long and close working relationship with Matt Drudge, a man who will rightfully take his place in the history books as an Internet news pioneer. I am also excited to be a partner in an inspired new endeavor, the Huffington Post. The last time I worked with Arianna she got a guy who didn't deserve to be buried in Arlington National Cemetery disinterred. That was cool. I admit: I like to go where the action is.

As for my politics, I am, quite literally, an open book. 'Hollywood, Interrupted' spells it out perfectly. I am a raucous, opinionated, red meat eating libertarian-leaning conservative who refuses to be relegated to a conservative ghetto. I have lived on L.A.'s liberal Westside for all of my life. I went to the liberal Brentwood School. Most of my friends and extended family lean left and will all attest that at gatherings I gleefully disagree with them. Yet I still love them, and refuse to give up on getting them to see things my way. But the last election cycle gave me an ulcer. As a Dennis Miller/South Park kind of Republican, I am offended by both 'Bush is Hitler' rhetoric and fetus-in-a-jar political speech.

What the world needs more of is amicable -- even jocular -- disagreement. Bringing my former boss and longtime friend Arianna 's intriguing friends to the blogosphere, the ultimate level playing field, makes perfect sense to me, and I am thrilled to be committed to such a groundbreaking project. Will my pals on the right have a place to offer their two cents at the Huffington Post? Absolutely. Will I agree with everyone's written word? Of course not. But that's precisely the point. May the best ideas win.


56 posted on 01/16/2006 6:47:38 AM PST by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief

"May the best ideas win."

The "truth" will win in the end, not this lib or his ideas.


57 posted on 01/16/2006 7:01:19 AM PST by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
What are the grounds for impeachment under Scottish law?

Briefly, the argument for impeachment is that NSA spying is governed by statute under FISA (1978), that the administration did not comply with FISA requirements, and that such noncompliance is plainly a felony under US law, which would constitute grounds for impeachment, as did President Clinton's perjury.

The administration argues that FISA allows for exceptions made elsewhere in the law and points to the AUMF (the authorization for the use of military force) as the law that allows the president to conduct electronic surveillance on the basis that spying is part of warfare and since the President was authorized to use military force as he deems fit, he can also spy as he deems fit.

We will have to see how this plays out. IMHO, the President is on very shaky ground, because there is a specific statute (FISA) that addressed exactly the rules under which spying is legal, which the AUMF does not plainly override. Underneath it all, the administration's argument sounds to me like a much more refined version of Clinton quibbling over the definition of "is".

Personally, I think Arlen's a dope, but even a dope is right sometimes. However, as a practical matter, I think there is not much chance of Bush being impeached and even less chance of him being removed.

58 posted on 01/16/2006 7:02:28 AM PST by wotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
The last time I worked with Arianna she got a guy who didn't deserve to be buried in Arlington National Cemetery disinterred. That was cool. I admit: I like to go where the action is.

Thanks for the 'Breitbart fill'. . .I miss a lot; apparently ;^). . .

As for the action Breitbart mentions. . .it sounds more like he is going back to a 'past life'. (probably more to the story; but whatever. . .)

>That said. . .am left wondering if he just misconstrued or misread between the lines, perhaps. . .to come up with the specter. . .of Specter re this post.

Thanks again for the 'rest of the story'. . .

59 posted on 01/16/2006 7:06:57 AM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief

Brietbart update:

After leaving the Huffington Post, Andrew Breitbart started getting huge traffic on Breitbart.Com between Aug 15 and Sept , when The Drudge Report began linking to Breitbart's legal copies of AP and Reuters news stories, make Breitbart.com popular overnight.

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=&url=breitbart.com


60 posted on 01/16/2006 7:06:59 AM PST by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson