Replies

He just said that the president and the 2 houses of Congress being in the same party....is the meaning of TYRANNY???

duh...we ELECTED them, AL!!!

219 posted on 01/16/2006 9:28:33 AM PST by Txsleuth (Thank you to all that donated on the Freepathon...next time more monthlies!!)

233 posted on 01/16/2006 9:30:52 AM PST by YaYa123

He just said that the president and the 2 houses of Congress being in the same party....is the meaning of TYRANNY??? duh...we ELECTED them, AL!!!

Yes, I have heard this theory many times - the fact that both houses and the WH is in Republican control, the checks and balances are no longer in play and so therefore one of these houses have to come back to the RATs - Impeach. The LLL just keeps spouting this over and over in the attempt to say it often enough so the masses believe it (those without access to alternate media). They also like to point out the Republicans control the SCOTUS!! The only way I can understand such utter nonsense is that more members were appointed by Repubs than the RAT administrations. I have not check to even see if that is correct - but the leaning of the SCOTUS over the past 2-3 decades has most decidedly been to the LLL regardless of who appointed these bozos.

505 posted on 01/16/2006 10:14:02 AM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)

He just said that the president and the 2 houses of Congress being in the same party....is the meaning of TYRANNY???

He didn't have a problem with 1992-1994?

734 posted on 01/16/2006 11:34:51 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie because he didn't bake one.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794