Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santa Cruz looks to raise minimum wage to $9.25/hour
sacbee ^ | 1-18-06

Posted on 01/18/2006 4:13:39 PM PST by LouAvul

SANTA CRUZ, Calif. (AP) - Labor leaders in this left-leaning coastal city have launched a controversial campaign to raise the minimum wage to $9.25 an hour, $2.50 more than the state-mandated minimum.

Workers need the bump to keep up with the area's high housing costs, and businesses have an obligation to pay "responsible wages" when the state minimum isn't enough, city officials and community activists said at a news conference at City Hall on Tuesday.

The campaign has gained the endorsement of four of the City Council's seven members, but some opponents said it will drive businesses out and make it harder to attract new companies. If the drive is successful, Santa Cruz would join only a handful of other cities, including San Francisco and Santa Fe, that have their own minimum wages.

Supporters point to a University of California, Berkeley study that concluded that San Francisco's higher minimum wage of $8.82 an hour has raised prices throughout the city but did not trigger layoffs or business collapses.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: california
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: JustAnotherOkie; Carry_Okie
Don't those damn idiots realize that everyone who's salary is tied to the minimum wage even higher will get associated pay raises too. They just love to pay taxes.

That is the whole reason behind it. Santa Cruz has a bloated public employee payroll. Public employee unions will get automatic pay increases. Meanwhile, private sector employees, consumers and property owners will get the shaft.

Of course, being as far left as Santa Cruz is, the idiots get what they vote for... it is a Mecca for dope, bums, and political grifters.

Just wait, the Beach Flats and other areas are about to experience a spike in gang violence, it is a long time comin'. They don't allow the police to cooperate with INS and have this Orwellian police review board. Being a policeman in that town is pointless, unless of course you got roots there or a big stake in the pension plan.

NOTHING that happens in Santa Cruz surprises me anymore... ain't that right Carry_Okie???

21 posted on 01/18/2006 6:20:14 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
obligation to pay "responsible wages" when the state minimum isn't enough, city officials and community activists said at a news conference at City Hall on Tuesday.

Looks like Mc Donald's will have a $6 Big Mac.

Maybe there will be some job that Americans won't do now that they will do then.

22 posted on 01/18/2006 7:13:45 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Who dat?

Not everyone living in a $1/$2 Million dollar home paid anything close to that.....

If one were to have carefully selected and purchased as much home as they could afford - 30 years ago.... They currently live in a home and neighborhood FAR beyond what they could afford if they had to buy today....

My home is not an unusual example for this area.....and it's market value has increased to more than 12 times what I paid for it....
Homes in the neighborhood sell in less than a month, typically over the asking price with multiple offers..
It's NUTS!

Having purchased long enough ago, we are protected against criminal taxes by Prop 13..
I pay less that $1600 per year in property taxes....living near a fellow who bought a smaller and less valuable home SEVERAL years ago who must pay property taxes of approx. $9000 per year.... I can't imagine what the property taxes must be on folks who buy today - at prices between 1 and 2 million.

The foolish ones, borrowing against their equity and living even further beyond their means.... They will ultimately have to sell - since they can't make payments on the equity loans and will end up with nothing but grossly depreciated "goods or vehicles" purchased with the loans...

The smarter ones, await their scheduled date for leaving the area -- cashing out --- buying a dream home in a lower cost of housing area -- and using the cash balance for quality of life and security.....back "home"..

Semper Fi


23 posted on 01/18/2006 8:26:48 PM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
NOTHING that happens in Santa Cruz surprises me anymore... ain't that right Carry_Okie???

Santa Cruz is the embodiment of Slave Party corruption, the model for Sustainable Development, and the county where the Agenda21 was first implemented.

In Santa Cruz, there is no such thing as "too far."

24 posted on 01/18/2006 9:07:19 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

I'm so glad I don't live there.


25 posted on 01/18/2006 11:21:37 PM PST by FOG724 (Governor Spendanator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Actually, the median home price for a single family home in Santa Cruz County is $750,000 while the median price for a condominium averages between $400,000 and $550,000.


26 posted on 01/18/2006 11:35:35 PM PST by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old republic

At least that is according to the local realestate web sites.

http://www.homegain.com/local_real_estate/CA/santa_cruz.html


27 posted on 01/18/2006 11:37:44 PM PST by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Supporters point to a University of California, Berkeley study that concluded that San Francisco's higher minimum wage of $8.82 an hour has raised prices throughout the city but did not trigger layoffs or business collapses.

Asking UCB to weigh in on whether a socialist intrusion into business is helpful or harmful is like asking your kid if it's ok to eat cookies for supper.

28 posted on 01/19/2006 9:18:51 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

I think this is a great idea!
And while they're at it, make it a requirement that every person hire at least one other person at $9.25/hour to do stuff for them.


29 posted on 01/21/2006 3:24:28 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson