Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clive

And if there were not a United States there would not be a Canada auto industry.


3 posted on 01/19/2006 5:23:42 AM PST by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: YOUGOTIT
Not so.
Actually, the one downside of the Auto Pact has been that at least prior to its inception Canada had the technology to and did build vehicles for its own domestic use from the ground up. Chrysler's (named for its founder - Canadian "Walter") tool room in Windsor Ontario was then the largest such operation in the British Commonwealth.
Otherwise, the Auto Pact has overall been highly beneficial for both nations and accordingly served as the prototype for NAFTA as it was originally envisioned by President Reagan & Prime Minister Mulroney.
9 posted on 01/19/2006 6:43:01 AM PST by GMMAC (paraphrasing Parrish: "damned Liberals, I hate those bastards!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: YOUGOTIT
And if there were not a United States there would not be a Canada auto industry

Maybe you could elaborate on that statement.
Canadians buy approx 2,000,000 vehicles per year.
We also produce Hondas, Toyotas, Susukis here in Canada.
If we couldn't buy the 1.2M U.S. vehicles per year, why
couldn't and woudn't we build more of the other vehicles
available? How would the production of more Hondas, Toyotas etal
not qualify as "Canadian Auto Industry"?
I've driven mostly G.M. cars all my life, but a car built
in Canada is a car built in Canada regardless of whether it's
an American, German, Korean or Japanese company, n'est pas?
What am I missing?

10 posted on 01/19/2006 6:48:28 AM PST by CaptainCanada (The Canadian electorate is under no obligation to perpetuate foolishness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson