Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"I do feel this is all about vengeance. I won't say my daughter didn't make a mistake. But the minute it became personal, the judge should've removed himself,"

I agree why wasnt he forced to recuse himself? I think they got really strong grounds to appeal this decision.

1 posted on 01/31/2006 2:24:01 AM PST by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: freepatriot32

Where the hell are these kids' parents?


43 posted on 01/31/2006 4:57:46 AM PST by No Longer Free State (No event has just one cause, no person has just one motive, no action has just the intended effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

Libertarian lunatic ping.


44 posted on 01/31/2006 5:01:42 AM PST by verity (The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
I agree why wasnt he forced to recuse himself? I think they got really strong grounds to appeal this decision.

That logic would make contempt of court charges impossible. The perp could just call the judge a nasty name in court everytime they want another judge, and the judge can't charge him "because it would be personal". These idiotic girls are getting a badly needed wake up call to the real world. These "parents" obviously aren't taking their children's development very seriously.

46 posted on 01/31/2006 5:06:17 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

To quote Nelson Muntz: "Ha ha!" Gals got what they deserved.


47 posted on 01/31/2006 5:08:26 AM PST by Puddleglum (Thank God the Boston blowhard lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

Lesson learned: Don't screw around with a judge. Not that difficult to learn.


49 posted on 01/31/2006 5:16:52 AM PST by When_Penguins_Attack (Smashing Windows, Breaking down Gates. Proud Mepis User!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

I think the cop was definitely wrong here.


52 posted on 01/31/2006 5:26:21 AM PST by RabidBartender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

The judge did what needed to be done. These kids violated a court order. THe violation wasn't an accident. It was the very definition of contempt. They thought they could get away with it and they got caught. Hopefully, they have been humbled by this experience. Bravo to the judge for doing the right thing!


53 posted on 01/31/2006 5:37:07 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

This should make people be more careful what they say or do on the NET. It might come back to bite you in the ass.


55 posted on 01/31/2006 5:40:03 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
"Meerschaert's mother, Polly, agreed. "I do feel this is all about vengeance. I won't say my daughter didn't make a mistake"

Seems like the mother is a big part of the problem. "MISTAKE", mistake about what? 12x12=143 is a mistake if you actually think the answer is 143. Doing something you know is wrong is NOT A MISTAKE.

The mother obviously does not believe in accepting responsibility for ones actions.

57 posted on 01/31/2006 5:42:17 AM PST by Wurlitzer (The difference between democrats and terrorists is the terrorists don't claim to support the troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

Stupid children. This judge may have just saved them from some real heartache in the future. The parents' comments prove where the problem lies.


63 posted on 01/31/2006 5:52:52 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

no this was contempt.

They were disobeying a direct order of the judge. They were showing contumacious conduct with regards to the court and the orders of the court.

It was not personal. It is a standard procedure. You violate probation, you get the full sentence you were eligible to have.

ANY judge would be forced to do the same.


66 posted on 01/31/2006 6:07:39 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

What was that old saw about two wrongs not making a right? The kids are wrong, and the judge is wrong.


72 posted on 01/31/2006 6:40:31 AM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

are you kidding? Except for the one, those parents' reactions make it crystal clear why the kids are screwing up. My parents would have been furious with the judge if he gave me LESS than a month in jail.


73 posted on 01/31/2006 6:40:35 AM PST by Flightdeck (Longhorns+January=Rose Bowl Repeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

How can he prove the bottles in the pictures weren't filled with Coke? I have a video of Uma Thurman killing a bunch of people with a sword. Better prosecute her for murder.


80 posted on 01/31/2006 7:02:49 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

These girls are out of control but so is this jackass judge. He feels he's been dissed and wants revenge


83 posted on 01/31/2006 7:09:02 AM PST by dennisw ("What one man can do another can do" - The Edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
Photos of the jailed women...


84 posted on 01/31/2006 7:10:57 AM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
I agree why wasnt he forced to recuse himself?

Judges do not recuse themselves for contempt of court situations, nor will another judge intervene.

If the pressed the issue, they may well have gotten six months from another judge.

87 posted on 01/31/2006 7:18:10 AM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
I agree why wasnt he forced to recuse himself? I think they got really strong grounds to appeal this decision.

Recuse himself? On what grounds? He witnessed the kids violating the terms of their sentencing. I don't think the ridicule had anything to do with it, and even if it did, that isn't reason to recuse, AFAIK.

92 posted on 01/31/2006 7:30:33 AM PST by TChris ("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

Bad girls, Bad girls
Whatcha want, watcha want
Whatcha gonna do
When judge Martone come for you
Tell me
Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
Yeaheah


94 posted on 01/31/2006 7:31:06 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

Perhaps the real problem is the unrealistic attitudes about alcohol that are becoming dominant in our society.

One is not supposed to touch a drop of alcohol until one's 21st birthday. In Maryland, the legislature toyed with the idea of making it illegal for parents to permit the consumption of alcohol by their own children in their own home at any time prior to a child's 21st birthday.

Which raises the question: Why do we believe that a magical fairy touches a person on the head on his 21st birthday with the fully-developed ability to drink in an appropriate way?

Myself, I began "drinking" at age 4. That's right. Age 4. A sip of my dad's beer, a sip of wine. As we got older, a sip of scotch, or of a whiskey sour, or of some other cocktail. As we got even older, sips turned into our own glasses of wine at dinner, maybe a half ounce or an ounce. A little older, a little more in the glass.

By the time we were of "drinking age," we all knew how to drink appropriately. Four kids. No drunk driving arrests, no alcohol problems. Of the four of us, we have our fair share of life's problems. We aren't perfect by any stretch of the imagination. But none of us have problems with alcohol. We're all hard-working, taxpaying citizens who drink socially.

Why? Because our parents didn't trust that the "Alcohol Fairy" was going to wave a magic wand on our 18th birthdays (that was the legal age when we were young) and make us responsible drinkers. Our parents TAUGHT US how to drink responsibly, how to prepare for adulthood, from the time we were small children.


sitetest


99 posted on 01/31/2006 7:51:48 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson