Posted on 02/08/2006 1:07:13 PM PST by RepublicNewbie
Soros is assisting the Russian government in whipping anti-American setiment in Russia. He is behind the Yushenko election, who will lose power this year, and allow the prr-Russian canadate back into power.
I wonder when Soros will actually do something beneficial for humanity and leave this world.
Putin is therefore a false target of Soros, as Putin will remain in power as long as the KGB wants him to stay there.
Ernst Stavro Blofeld
Ro 14:1 Now him that is weak in faith, take unto you: not in disputes about thoughts.
Indeed, one's faith must be weak if fear of demons residing in plants causes the conjuring of black masked DEAmen to whip the wills of the masses in line with a bit of terror in the night. Disputes about thoughts within the minds of men being altered for a time by communion with a gift from God need not be resolved by mystery men of might in the night.
Romans 9:32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumbling stone;
Ro 14:22 Hast thou faith? Have it to thyself before God. Blessed is he that condemneth not himself in that which he alloweth.
"...rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our own will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law,’ because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual." - Thomas Jefferson
Eat what you're suggesting ...
Communist? Perhaps, using capitalism on the chess board. I think he's just a rich megalomaniac with delusions of both grandeur and power. That being said, the demoncrap party is already completely captured, (as proved by traitor xlinton's impeachment hearing), and the republican party is almost there. Besides the demoncraps in pubbie clothing, there are the rino's and those still within their fifth estate facade.
These things considered, Soros is just another whackjob. As long as we know him, let him spend his money. The people will always decide.
Eating hash would be okay with you, Dougie?
You stopped laughing those years ago, period. Not to worry, we'll laugh at you.
Shhhh, shouldn't bother his delusions ....
He knows what God thinks, Pax ...
I attended a Libertarian function some years back, in which I mentioned the Amtrak-Conrail accident, and what would be the response to someone responsible for killing people while under the influence. I didn't get an answer.
A response from a Norml press release with respect to the above won't suffice. We do hold people responsible for alcohol related deaths.
Under certain strict rules, I would consider legalizing drugs.
1. Drive while under the influence and you lose your driver's license for five years.
2. Have an accident while under the influence, lose license for 10 years.
3. Injure someone in an accident while under the influence, lose license forever.
4. If you need rehab, you get one free rehab; after that, you can live and die in the gutter.
5. Other than one free rehab, absolutely no social services or welfare if you cannot find a job because you are stoned all the time.
6. Employers have the right to conduct a drug test upon hiring and random drug tests to make sure the employees are actually giving a full day's work. A druggie has no right to a job or right to have an employer carry him if he can't perform.
7. If you use drugs, you don't get a government job of any kind.
8. If you distribute without a pharmaceutical license, you go to prison.
9. A mother who gives birth to a drugged baby is sterilized.
So, if you want to use drugs, you don't hurt anyone, you don't use social services, you find a way to work and provide for yourself, then spend your life loaded and drugs should be legal.
Thanks. I just left a comment there. I'll never apologize.
BTTT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.