"Here's a judge who rejects the legislator's conclusions that, for reasons the LEGISLATOR decides to accept, certain acts should be illegal.
"
Actually, that's not what he did at all. The law is written poorly, in that it does not specify which acts must be reported. Two district attorneys had different ideas, with one of them believing that even teenagers fondling each other should be included under this law.
The problem is that the legislature did not write a proper law. Laws involving criminal liability must be specific in describing whatever acts they consider criminal. This law did not do that.
If a D.A. can prosecute a couple of teenagers who are groping each other a little in the back seat of their car, it is a bad law, since that's a pretty universal practice...one which no law will ever be able to prevent.
Your problem is with the process. You don't agree with the law Kansans have passed so you think the divine judges can amend it and that's just fine. In this case it appears that that opinion will not carry the day.
Another problem with this is that it seems there is more intent to prosecute the boys. And then what, they become registered sex offenders for life for being young and ... amorous?