Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZGuy
He even said on the stand that an underage girl performing oral sex on a boy need not be reported, but that a boy performing oral sex on a girl may need to be reported.

Therein lies the problem. Facially neutral but gender biased in application.

4 posted on 02/10/2006 6:57:55 AM PST by peyton randolph (As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All

Not a knee jerk conservatism case.

The law apparently suggests some discretion be provided the people on the scene. Two 17 yr olds have sex the day before their 18th birthdays and it rises to the notice of someone, perhaps because the girl asks for a pregnancy test a few months later.

This situation doesn't deserve prosecution. Some discretion is appropriate.


19 posted on 02/10/2006 7:11:09 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson