Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MineralMan
Because I have no reason to do so. I'm commenting on the article, not prosecutions in Kansas.

:-} Whatever.

86 posted on 02/10/2006 8:16:27 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

Whatever....yes....well, here's what the Kansas Attorney General said, as quoted in the article:



Assistant Attorney General Scott Hesse, who is representing Foulston in the lawsuit, said in his closing arguments that Kansas is looking out for the health of its children through the statute, which falls under its child protection laws.

"It is a crime to have sex with minors and it is a crime for minors under 16 to have sex. ... Since it is a crime, it is also a cause for mandatory reporters to report the crime," Hesse said. "



When the Attorney General says it's a crime for teenagers to fool around with each other, and when a D.A. thinks it's a crime to fondle, then we have a problem. That you do not see the problem is not my concern.


88 posted on 02/10/2006 8:24:47 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson