To: Fee
Though America is close to Israel, their culture is different enough from ours that I doubt that would be a very viable idea. However, the NATO idea is a good one, if it could be made relevant.
3 posted on
02/12/2006 4:06:39 PM PST by
Cathryn Crawford
(you are indeed a pretty pitiful person and a lot worse than any Sand N****r that I know! - calex59)
To: Cathryn Crawford
Though America is close to Israel, their culture is different enough from ours that I doubt that would be a very viable idea. However, the NATO idea is a good one, if it could be made relevant. Nice to see you again.
It's a different country, 51st state is a foolish idea, likely rejected on all sides.
NATO, that won't work because it brings NATO into direct conflict with fundamental Islam, call it what you want.
A better question, why does NATO exist?
8 posted on
02/12/2006 4:19:01 PM PST by
SJackson
(There is but one language which can be held to these people, and this is terror, William Eaton)
To: Cathryn Crawford
Not needed. The Israelis have, by various estimates, about 200 warheads of supposedly tactical size. They also have rockets. Within reasonably short time the Israeli warheads could be made bigger [say, 50-80 of 1-2MT size], and after 50x2MT the only place to find Iran will be in the books on ancient history.
12 posted on
02/12/2006 4:32:04 PM PST by
GSlob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson